placestats

Pope County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3757
Density3.9people per km² of land
Median household income$62,500
Land area955km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pope County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Boundary County, ID, Florence County, WI, Washita County, OK, Chariton County, MO, Ramsey County, ND, Runnels County, TX, Pend Oreille County, WA, Wasco County, OR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pope Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%0th pct by value5th pct by value -2.9 sd
Median gross rent$4380th pct by value1st pct by value -2.9 sd
Black Protestant adherents7.1898th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.4 sd
Mean income of departing households$36,6320th pct by value3rd pct by value -1.9 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.159%96th pct97th pct +1.8 sd
Cholesterol screening84.1%98th pct72nd pct +1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.413445-1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.2%9080-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work34,570 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.833%71+1.8County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18%3433+0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability29.5%8066-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.564·42·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.2%4352+0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.281618-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.5%2016+0.9CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents7.1898·92·+2.4
Business closing rate10.576·85·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments47———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.4250·34·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1219+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents04·6·-1.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain26.4%417+1.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.205%48·38·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort519———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income519———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.1%9872+1.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.9%3746+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15%8268-0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.5%4832-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.268·84·+0.3
Coronary heart disease5.6%8263-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%3547+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.8%6354-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.5%4453+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.7364·51·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Depression24.1%4548+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%6768-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.48286·67·+1.0
Economic connectedness0.8043549-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.2966·21·-1.4
Education score0.11754·51·+0.1
Effective property tax rate1.0251·64·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,191———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents20.754·53·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health18.4%6164-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.61521+0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.32%5219-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.5%5060-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.2%2736+0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%6161-0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02527178-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12658·72·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4374461+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$82,098k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.10857·45·+0.1
Hearing disability6.4%9671-1.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.5%5561-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.4%3961+0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate86.1%96·98·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.2%5359-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units2,273———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate98951·48·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$15,09888·89·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.4%5557-0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1054538-0.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,33652·58·-0.3
Jail population rate39646·47·-0.2
Labour force1,258———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%5663-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.6%929+1.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.7 years5655+0.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.9%1336+1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.4338·50·-0.7
Mammography in the past two years67.2%148-1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.13931·44·-0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,3091022-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$51,73048·39·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$36,6320·3·-1.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.2 min1024+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age50.8 years92·95·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$4380·1·-2.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$165,30056·46·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$62,500—48—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$58,0933036-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,68752·56·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.159%9697+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations23.99297+1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.1%6965-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99318·47·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.114·11·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.22940·30·-0.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity22.9%8678-1.1CDC PLACES
Obesity39.6%3135+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,364———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0536·20·-0.8
Owner-occupied housing units1,174———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,930———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return216·20·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,620———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,0162635-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$41,04846-1.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$152,500k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,715———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,707———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,283———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,288———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,867———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over978———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain516———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain587———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,599———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,646———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,263———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain483———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,763———
Poverty rate uncertain14.3%3544+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain16.1%2432+0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4893848-0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,330———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,436———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,231———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,222———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,142———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,175———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,133———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population97.8%94·93·+1.7
Preventable hospital stays2,4045364-0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate59357·50·-0.2
Private job growth13.596·98·+1.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs445———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03529095+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.9%69·58·+0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents34.422·20·-1.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200059.222·51·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20046238·53·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200861.450·58·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201269.956·70·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201681.780·85·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.976·79·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.372·75·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202421.188·87·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%0·5·-2.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.4%62·51·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains14.8%22·47·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.47%62·67·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.4%84·51·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%7867-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26%84·90·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain5.03%80·54·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain13.4%68·73·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain2.56%22·20·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.9%42·35·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.9%44·27·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.5%36·51·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.2%68·70·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain9.2%88·89·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain16.8%1424-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.5%3251+0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.0788·95·+1.1
Stroke3%6558-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.6%27·24·-0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,620———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,346———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.8%6665-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population3,757———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.02268587+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed67———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.3%88+1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate40%90·97·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units909———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%7168-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50654———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,225———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.