placestats

Catahoula Parish, LA

A parish, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8738
Density4.8people per km² of land
Median household income$47,753
Land area1837km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Catahoula Parish in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cameron County, PA, Monroe County, MO, Red River County, TX, St. Clair County, MO, Coal County, OK, Montgomery County, AR, Clay County, GA, Winn Parish, LA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Catahoula Parishis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Jail population rate14,197100th pct by value100th pct by value +23.2 sd
Jail admission rate28,116100th pct by value100th pct by value +15.3 sd
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1746.1%0th pct0th pct +3.0 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents76.1100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.6 sd
Poverty rate (model-based)30%2nd pct2nd pct +2.4 sd
High school graduation0.775%0th pct7th pct -2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4084241+0.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12.5%4831-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work73,200 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.4%2518+0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over26.8%65+1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability43%82+1.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.5952·63·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28.5%137+1.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2644720+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.8%1345+1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents034·45·-0.7
Black-white residential segregation41.759·31·+0.3County Health Rankings
Business closing rate10.378·83·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments153———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.7444·23·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.4%6981-0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.3432·8·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1746.1%00+3.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.359%76·88·+0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,073———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,073———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%5631+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.9%154+1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability22.6%42+1.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.6%8250+0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people52.884·96·+1.1
Coronary heart disease7.6%83+1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%7147-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking22.8%154+1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.1%8829+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.4752·70·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression27.7%1914+0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes15%176+1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.788·3·-1.3
Economic connectedness0.6924724-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6746624+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.22922·5·-0.9
Education score-1.0311·6·-1.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.2920·2·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,213———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents76.1100·99·+2.6
Fair or poor self-rated health29.6%64+1.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.75446-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%1413-1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity30%24+1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22%65+1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17.4%44+1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03245674-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.15290·95·+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.455046-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$219,590k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.91827·7·-0.6
Hearing disability8.5%317+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure42.1%155+1.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.7%2311+0.7CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.775%07-2.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate76%58·59·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity21.7%126+1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units4,447———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0377—11—Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$3,41750·54·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.7%84+1.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain89.78861-1.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate28,116100·100·+15.3
Jail population rate14,197100·100·+23.2
Labour force3,365———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation14.9%75+1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support31.8%53+1.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.05012113-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy70.9 years3111-0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness38%2310+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2.4920·15·-0.8
Mammography in the past two years76%9672+1.4CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.752·3·-1.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$54,8186012+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,90936·15·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$40,49236·9·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29.5 min2418+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age38.8 years10·26·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72461·21·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$88,00012·4·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$47,753—13—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$40,13922-2.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain2572·1·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0491%2818-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations19.89693+1.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability19.4%84+1.2CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.668—22·—
Mutual-friend share0.99984·92·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.5818·9·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.12348·47·-0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity35.7%176+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity41.6%4016+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,076———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units2,337———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,510———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return274·86·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,688———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$22,92766-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$47,1536023+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$397,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,438———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,414———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,058———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,589———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,182———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,589———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,117———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,368———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,543———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,893———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,375———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,026———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,906———
Poverty rate28.1%25+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)30%22+2.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6833212+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,765———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,954———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,225———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,193———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,856———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,858———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,348———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population15.4%11·6·-1.5
Preventable hospital stays2,7936448-0.4County Health Rankings
Private job growth10.594·97·+1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,641———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01523633-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps26.9%93·97·+1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents78.996·94·+1.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200062.970·64·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.872·64·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200867.864·74·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.142·60·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201672.530·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202073.636·61·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202477.338·67·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.440·69·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.13%82·48·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit28.1%88·92·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains8.13%20·10·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.19%60·61·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.8%85·90·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability6.1%44+1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.2%8·35·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic34.5%75·90·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.18%8·13·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.4%6·16·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married33.3%76·75·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married49.3%50·32·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.98%63·90·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic62.9%44·26·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.18%26·76·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher16.6%7222+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.3%2610+0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.27352·32·-0.1
Stroke4.5%84+1.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication63.7%81·94·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,200———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,626———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off16.1%95+1.1CDC PLACES
Total population8,738———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01633023-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed152———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.5%2818+0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate30.8%78·90·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,371———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.3%85+1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,621———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,479———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost13,4454418-0.0County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.