placestats

Clay County, GA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2853
Density5.6people per km² of land
Median household income$48,715
Land area506km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Clay County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Monroe County, MO, Charlton County, GA, Douglas County, MO, Deer Lodge County, MT, Dade County, MO, Gogebic County, MI, Hughes County, OK, Forest County, PA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Clay Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Children in single-parent households0.61%100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.6 sd
Median household income (model-based)$37,8580th pct1st pct -3.5 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202446.20th pct by value11th pct by value -3.2 sd
Returns claiming the earned income credit37.2%100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.1 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202044.62nd pct by value12th pct by value -3.0 sd
Share Black, not Hispanic59.5%100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3344-2.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance15.3%1716+0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work21,265 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over28.9%03+2.0CDC PLACES
Any disability35.8%8526-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.774·78·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.9%7730-0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.436117-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12.7%10098-2.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents2.6766·79·-0.1
Business closing rate7.1424·22·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments43———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.988·84·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.8%9693-2.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents022·6·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain39%62+2.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.61%100·99·+3.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort675———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income675———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.6%10078+2.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.1%8122-1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.1%9228-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.8%5835+0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.628·75·-0.6
Coronary heart disease6.7%6716-0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.6%2713+0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.6%7323-0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year52.6%7823+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying8.0294·90·+1.7IRS county migration flows
Depression19.9%10089-2.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes16.1%03+2.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.98752·14·+0.1
Economy score-0.3074·4·-1.6
Education score-1.462·2·-2.2
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.0488·66·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed914———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents17.718·46·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health26.9%2110+0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.52924+0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%8449+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity29.2%25+1.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.3%6718-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.9%5415-0.1CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.16496·98·+2.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4417056-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$110,080k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.32396·32·+1.3
Hearing disability6.3%9874-2.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure43.2%63+1.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.8%5025+0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.9%64·65·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity23.9%03+2.6CDC PLACES
Housing units1,936———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,39486·94·+1.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,15466·71·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.2%86+1.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1194222+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6,34793·90·+0.7
Jail population rate72375·81·-0.1
Labour force977———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation15.3%04+2.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support28.8%1710+0.8CDC PLACES
Life expectancy72.6 years5423+0.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness40.2%22+1.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.2238·30·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years74.9%9063+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.462·4·-2.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$51,289146-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$55,24184·51·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$48,08884·34·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20 min9280-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.1 years72·83·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5782·4·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$92,50016·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$48,715—14—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$37,85801-3.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain96666·24·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0332%66-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations10.53249-0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17.8%3110+0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99760·81·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.7686·93·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.31222·27·-0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity34.5%279+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity42.3%1913+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,179———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.1844·21·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units907———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,140———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return216·46·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move1,921———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$29,0097224+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$39,285143-1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$112,710k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,869———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,853———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,519———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,290———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over1,964———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over893———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain644———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line736———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,794———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,788———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,590———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain443———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,848———
Poverty rate uncertain23%610+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)26.4%23+2.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality758126+1.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,277———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,309———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,440———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,402———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,273———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,434———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,442———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population68.3%51·55·+0.3
Preventable hospital stays1,30710095-1.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,67290·97·+1.7
Private job growth-5.266·4·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs432———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01734847-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps27.5%100·97·+2.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents24.84·5·-1.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200035.32·3·-2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200438.92·5·-2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200838.82·9·-2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201238.42·8·-2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201644.82·11·-2.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202044.62·12·-3.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202446.20·11·-3.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.920·56·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.54%88·56·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit37.2%100·99·+3.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains7.96%16·9·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%2·9·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year79.7%98·95·+1.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability6.1%24+2.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over31.3%98·98·+2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic59.5%100·98·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.94%2·5·-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.8%66·81·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married40.1%96·92·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married41.8%10·9·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women100%—100·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic39.6%4·9·-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain10.1%88·95·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain22.6%10054+2.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours43.2%106+1.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.836·9·-1.1
Stroke4.6%03+2.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication65.8%100·98·+2.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,130———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,585———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off17.2%03+2.6CDC PLACES
Total population2,853———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.032356-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed63———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate6.4%24+2.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate39.1%90·96·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units757———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.1%66+1.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain612———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,064———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain16,381106+1.3County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.