placestats

Alfalfa County, OK

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5685
Density2.5people per km² of land
Median household income$67,870
Land area2244km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Alfalfa County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bear Lake County, ID, Scott County, KS, Haskell County, KS, Pembina County, ND, Park County, MT, Hansford County, TX, Wheeler County, TX, Norman County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Alfalfa Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
High blood pressure37%2nd pct22nd pct +3.2 sd
Poverty rate (model-based)19.8%2nd pct15th pct +2.9 sd
Trend in average test score0.0627100th pct100th pct +2.9 sd
Coronary heart disease6.6%4th pct19th pct +2.4 sd
High cholesterol33.8%0th pct25th pct +2.3 sd
Hearing disability8.6%4th pct6th pct +2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5417494+0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.6%2638+0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work44,970 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.1%2438+0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability36.4%423+1.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.6636·24·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.5%1248+1.3CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.1062942-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.5%8267-1.2CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain10086·96·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents094·45·-0.2
Business closing rate8.9754·60·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments111———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.0734·28·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%6053-0.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents522·37·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain21.5%833+1.5Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort744———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income744———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.3%7440+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.1%1042+1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.1%2840+0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.7%3825-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people43.992·91·+0.9
Coronary heart disease6.6%419+2.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%3051+0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.4%834+1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59%3050-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2822·12·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression23.9%3650+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.1%1643+0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.31218·33·-1.2
Economic connectedness0.9725480+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.018382+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4798·31·-1.6
Education score1.4297·99·+1.9
Effective property tax rate0.6328·30·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,325———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents30.184·71·+0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health19.9%2450+0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.31331+0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%6027+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.4%2245+0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain81———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.7%4267+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.3%3257+0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.008757893-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11128·42·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3978293-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$499,710k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.089150·59·+0.0
Hearing disability8.6%46+2.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure37%222+3.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.8%025+2.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.7%58·76·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13%2248+0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units2,480———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate59631·18·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,16972·82·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.6%3252+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1053838+0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,58441·33·-0.4
Jail population rate16221·10·-0.8
Labour force2,394———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.7%2250+0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.9%1126+1.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.04858294+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.7 years7077+0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.7%2267+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2882·96·+0.9
Mammography in the past two years69.2%2017-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.20214·47·-0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,8931039-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$48,83522·30·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,6674·4·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.3 min3657+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.4 years66·74·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6142·6·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$103,0008·10·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$67,870—62—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,517834-1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill6492·10·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.148%8896+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations23.19296+1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.4%2436+1.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99552·59·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.89736·20·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.37866·58·+0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.9%1028+1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity39.6%2035+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,890———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents024·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,488———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,050———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return284·95·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,436———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,1731025-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,5891032-1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$280,720k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,661———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,673———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,766———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,620———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,342———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,135———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain629———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line890———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,495———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,495———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,824———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher899———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,699———
Poverty rate uncertain14%1447+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)19.8%215+2.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3806076-0.5County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,507———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,671———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,434———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,083———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,258———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,262———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,160———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.8
Preventable hospital stays1,0959697-1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate43350·30·-0.2
Private job growth0.98342·38·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs719———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03439094+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13%89·52·+1.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.164·81·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200076.476·92·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200482.486·97·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200883.188·98·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201284.582·96·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.990·98·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.592·98·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.990·97·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.584·63·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions5.18%80·77·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.5%84·51·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20.7%48·77·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%26·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%94·46·+1.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%2444+0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20%30·53·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain2.88%68·84·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain3.2%—44·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.3%96·92·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.42%10·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race5.84%50·52·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.9%22·19·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.7%50·26·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.2%24·49·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain6.16%95·93·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.48%—80·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic81.4%38·51·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.78%76·68·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.7%4645-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35%3470+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.1590·96·+0.8
Stroke3.2%1842+0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.7%84·57·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,930———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,738———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.5%841+1.4CDC PLACES
Total population5,685———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.0627100100+2.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed69———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%4472-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate23.8%69·80·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units590———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.2%2643+0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50760———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain76———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,926———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,6516777-0.5County Health Rankings

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.