placestats

Haskell County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3695
Density2.5people per km² of land
Median household income$69,138
Land area1496km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Haskell County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Kingsbury County, SD, Morrow County, OR, Alfalfa County, OK, Nuckolls County, NE, Hansford County, TX, Norman County, MN, Barnes County, ND, Scott County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Haskell Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share foreign-born23.7%97th pct by value97th pct by value +3.2 sd
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50148100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.6 sd
Housing insecurity15.3%6th pct28th pct +2.0 sd
Net business formation rate6.7698th pct by value97th pct by value +1.9 sd
No leisure-time physical activity32.1%4th pct17th pct +1.9 sd
Per capita personal income$89,05896th pct96th pct +1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5869698+1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance16.8%1011+1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain32,170 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.7%1435+1.0CDC PLACES
Any disability33.4%2439+1.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0650·32·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23%4871-0.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking16.7%8064-1.1CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain148100·100·+2.6Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate5.814·8·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments107———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.684·88·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.5%9478-1.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents16.970·76·+0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16%3060+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort774———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income774———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.4%2213-0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.9%1446+1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.4%1436+1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.2%1816-0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.752·75·-0.0
Coronary heart disease6.1%1038+1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%6678-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.9%1440+0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.1%2041-0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.0382·80·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression20.7%8084-0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.5%1236+1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.18818·37·-1.0
Economic connectedness0.892468-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.037783+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.3368·76·+0.6
Effective property tax rate1.4486·85·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,578———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents32.492·75·+1.3
Fair or poor self-rated health21.9%1435+1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.72770-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.43%8056+0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity18.6%631+1.6CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population876———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.6%4469+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.8%1847+0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.000997090-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12154·62·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3839498-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$481,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.24266·68·+0.4
Hearing disability7.4%2428+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.6%1860+0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.8%1040+1.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate77%42·65·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.3%628+2.0CDC PLACES
Housing units1,545———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-11,5216·5·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.9%1646+0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain73.28583-1.0County Health Rankings
Labour force1,620———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.2%1241+0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.6%2752+0.5CDC PLACES
Life expectancy78.9 years8086+0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.8%1866+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents14.344·84·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years69.6%2419-0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.56646·69·+0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$73,3084663-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,26910·19·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$56,79070·63·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain20.5 min5076-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age38 years20·21·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77658·33·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$154,80046·40·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$69,138—66—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,2026064+0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,22690·72·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0631%2836-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations22.48696+1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.4%1636+1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99436·50·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate6.7698·97·+1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.966·3·-1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity32.1%417+1.9CDC PLACES
Obesity42.4%412+1.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,384———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0342·18·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,066———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,610———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return292·97·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,159———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,6162044-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$89,0589696+1.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$323,280k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,630———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,630———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,912———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,660———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,336———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over582———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain387———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line386———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,598———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,574———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,208———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher519———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,780———
Poverty rate uncertain10.8%3371+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.8%6472-0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain3069691-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,616———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,599———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,570———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,396———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,354———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,410———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,278———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,8006685-0.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate33935·19·-0.5
Private job growth0.55142·32·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,094———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02675284+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.2%67·30·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.764·82·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200083.496·98·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200485.794·99·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200882.186·97·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201284.482·96·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.956·83·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.766·82·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.568·83·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-0.87412·18·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.76%76·73·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.1%56·35·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16.1%20·54·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%28·9·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.6%64·26·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4%1437+0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over15.8%12·17·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.59%6·3·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born23.7%97·97·+3.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race30.1%89·89·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.8%34·34·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.8%54·27·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married62.3%84·96·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.76%8·9·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic66.9%14·31·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.29%15·17·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.2%5453-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.1%3269+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.90262·92·+0.4
Stroke3.1%1850+0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.7%88·57·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,680———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,555———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.2%633+1.7CDC PLACES
Total population3,695———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0184620-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed42———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%6283-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain10.4%4·29·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain161———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.7%1432+0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50812———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain120———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,568———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.