placestats

Williamsburg city, VA

An independent city, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population15,564
Density672.0people per km² of land
Median household income$70,206
Land area23km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Williamsburg city in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bexar County, TX, Hamilton County, OH, Miami-Dade County, FL, Jefferson County, KY, Summit County, OH, Salem city, VA, Duval County, FL, Broward County, FL. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Williamsburg cityis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents40.3100th pct by value99th pct by value +7.6 sd
Share of births to unmarried women85.9%100th pct by value96th pct by value +6.7 sd
Share in the same house a year ago69.9%0th pct by value0th pct by value -6.3 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying24.5100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.3 sd
Share never married60.1%100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.1 sd
Departures per 100 people staying21.4100th pct by value100th pct by value +5.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3673416-0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.5%7276-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work89,170 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.1%7680-0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability29.8%5464-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying24.5100·100·+6.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.7%4145+0.4CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2169686+1.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16%6574-0.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain41.66·14·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents04·45·-0.9
Black-white residential segregation29.32·13·-2.2County Health Rankings
Business closing rate7.010·19·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments574———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed40———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened47———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.2412·31·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%2860+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents00·6·-1.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.6%3037+0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.318%66·82·+0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort603———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening86.1%7092+0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.9%6773-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15%5768-0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening63.4%7892+0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people12.378·21·+0.5
Coronary heart disease5.5%4668-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%4434+0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.1%6584-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.2%9086+1.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying21.4100·100·+5.5IRS county migration flows
Depression23.7%5252+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.3%5439-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.50159·69·+0.4
Economy score1.2642·73·-0.3
Education score-0.11155·35·+0.1
Effective property tax rate0.5766·24·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,928———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.264·11·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health17.8%7869-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.48676-1.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.59%9698+1.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.7%8167-1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population1,626———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.8%5466+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.9%5064-0.1CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.53103+2.5Census ACS 5-year
Health score0.70894·90·+1.6
Hearing disability6%3984+0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.8%3740-0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.1%1319+1.0CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.91%9461+1.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate52.6%8·2·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.2%8159-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units5,767———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.064620+3.1Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$18,25094·92·+1.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%5966-0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain609894-1.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate5,67992·88·+1.5
Jail population rate38463·45·-0.0
Labour force7,208———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.1%7261-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.2%8882-1.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.088301-2.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy78.6 years9084+1.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.6%6955-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents40.3100·99·+7.6
Mammography in the past two years77.7%5085+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.24518·27·-0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$85,3876481+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$80,47288·88·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$62,22226·74·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work17.1 min10090-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age24 years0·0·-4.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,36176·91·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$393,20098·93·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$70,206—68—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$70,2705469+0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,26538·73·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations13.89474+1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.6%5758-0.3CDC PLACES
Mobility score-2.162·1·-2.4
Net business formation rate1.2360·57·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying3.0698·97·+3.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.5%8374-0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity37.2%3359+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,973———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents08·78·-0.9
Other religion adherents2.7412·67·-1.1
Owner-occupied housing units2,615———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return20·0·-2.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,214———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,732260-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Population15,847———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over14,253———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over14,049———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,597———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,666———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,520———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,058———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,756———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,947———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,883———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher3,683———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census15,425———
Poverty rate14.1%4846+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)18.8%419+2.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3628480-1.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,725———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,320———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,787———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20127,748———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20167,626———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,890———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,851———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population44.6%20·25·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays1,73810086-2.1County Health Rankings
Private job growth10.598·97·+4.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs8,486———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps11.8%28·43·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents49.326·54·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200050.854·24·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200448.236·15·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200835.214·6·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201235.418·6·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2016274·2·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202029.16·3·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202427.44·2·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-23.40·0·-2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions9.39%98·95·+2.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.6%8·31·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.9%100·87·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.971%12·20·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.1%52·84·+0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%6762-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over17.1%58·26·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%2·24·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic6.75%96·95·+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic15.2%46·76·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced5.91%0·1·-3.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born10.4%51·86·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.01%37·63·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago69.9%0·0·-6.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%9·83·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married60.1%100·100·+6.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married29.8%0·0·-5.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women85.9%100·96·+6.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.64%12·30·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic67.3%72·31·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.16%6·5·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher48.5%9897+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.2%5244-0.1CDC PLACES
Stroke3%5958-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.3%41·67·-0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,180———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,446———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.4%7557-0.9CDC PLACES
Total population15,564———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.0254211-2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed280———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.9%1433+0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.8%94·45·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain794———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.6%6761-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 505,286———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain220———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,222———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,5198879-1.0County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.