placestats

Warren County, IN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8469
Density9.0people per km² of land
Median household income$74,635
Land area945km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Warren County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Morgan County, CO, Osage County, MO, Fillmore County, MN, York County, NE, Washington County, IL, Lewis and Clark County, MT, Chickasaw County, IA, Sibley County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Warren Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%0th pct30th pct +2.8 sd
Median property tax bill8240th pct by value18th pct by value -2.3 sd
Arthritis26.2%2nd pct27th pct +2.3 sd
High cholesterol34%0th pct21st pct +2.2 sd
Current asthma11.4%4th pct19th pct +2.1 sd
Current cigarette smoking17.8%4th pct30th pct +1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4311659-1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.4%5277-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work97,620 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.6%4469+0.0CDC PLACES
Any disability31.1%2655+0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.1546·34·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.2%227+2.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.218286+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.4%7636-0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.5156·50·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments144———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.892·89·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%1611+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents04·6·-1.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.2%5680-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.233%85·52·+0.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort900———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income900———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.6%7864+0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%030+2.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.3%1850+0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.4%7082+0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people21.348·49·-0.0
Coronary heart disease6%642+1.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.4%419+2.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.8%430+1.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.4%2858-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.6162·48·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression27.3%217+1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.9%1646+1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.3328·60·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.8442459-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7971946-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.1442·68·-0.2
Education score1.0696·96·+1.6
Effective property tax rate0.5154·16·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,424———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents17.262·45·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%2251+0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.42428+0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%4049-0.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.8%3466-0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.5%031+1.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.6%1851+0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02977276-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13692·86·+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3869697-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$389,010k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.096810·45·-1.4
Hearing disability6.7%3457+0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.7%841+1.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34%021+2.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%10099+1.3County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate81%70·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11%4473-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units3,687———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate78354·31·-0.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,23378·82·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.2%3061+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain64.89091-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,54728·32·-0.5
Jail population rate47773·58·+0.4
Labour force4,551———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.5%4974-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.4%5155-0.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.6 years4676-0.0County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00651—14·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$30k———Census local government finances
Loneliness34.5%2042+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents5.8830·46·-0.7
Mammography in the past two years75.3%5666+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.87160·86·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$74,1934665-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$55,03842·51·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,8056·19·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25.5 min3441+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years60·67·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$81536·43·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$160,00022·43·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,635—77—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$74,7507078+0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill8240·18·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0647%2238-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations135068-0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.7%2256+0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99238·41·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.2596·91·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.46420·23·-0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.7%4664+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity41.4%1018+1.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,359———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents086·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents02·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,722———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,840———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return266·60·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,112———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,7463666-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,0253659-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$484,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,498———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,518———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,920———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,645———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,040———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,772———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,061———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line802———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,338———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,354———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,737———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,041———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,440———
Poverty rate uncertain12.7%456+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.6%6483-0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3804276+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,768———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,960———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,998———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,800———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,930———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,472———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,370———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population68%44·55·+0.1
Preventable hospital stays4,020611+1.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate36358·21·-0.2
Private job growth-3.548·6·-1.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,497———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02537081+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.1%15·13·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents23.14·3·-1.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.150·54·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.466·63·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200855.246·41·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201264.264·56·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.574·72·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.776·73·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202479.178·72·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241984·83·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.73%4·15·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.4%52·23·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains14.3%20·44·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.741%2·12·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.1%96·72·+1.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%3467+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.9%56·63·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.9%40·21·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.4%66·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23%18·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60%86·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.68%76·63·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.11%41·19·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.5%82·94·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.12%74·55·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17.2%1026-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.3%424+1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.16424·60·-0.5
Stroke3%2058+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.2%92·65·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,050———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,155———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.1%2760+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population8,469———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01197368+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed127———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%6076-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain8.9%24·22·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain328———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%3668-0.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,698———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,832———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,3055081-0.2County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.