placestats

Chickasaw County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,868
Density9.1people per km² of land
Median household income$73,421
Land area1306km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chickasaw County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: York County, NE, Pennington County, MN, Warren County, IN, Tuolumne County, CA, King and Queen County, VA, Lyon County, IA, Lewis and Clark County, MT, Fillmore County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chickasaw Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$95,08798th pct97th pct +4.0 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.143%100th pct95th pct +2.6 sd
Economy score1.6996th pct by value88th pct by value +1.9 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.59%98th pct98th pct +1.8 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5696th pct96th pct +1.7 sd
Religious adherents73.896th pct by value91st pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.569696+1.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.3%5879-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work111,620 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.3%3464+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability26.8%8287-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.8314·9·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.4%4664+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1365875+0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking24%40+1.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain85.886·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.3
Business closing rate7.526·28·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments330———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed25———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.44·5·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2819+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents29.992·92·+1.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain9%9292-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.141%29·9·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,404———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,404———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.7%2029-0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%3665+0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.7%5072-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening63.5%9692+1.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people23.364·55·+0.2
Coronary heart disease5.5%3668+0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.9%8282-0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.1%2249+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year68.1%8092+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.3724·14·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression20.6%9085-1.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.5%4674-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.71764·80·+0.6
Economic connectedness1.057690+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8364454-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.6996·88·+1.9
Education score0.77984·87·+1.1
Effective property tax rate1.150·69·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,915———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents9.1830·20·-0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health17.5%4472-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.45053-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.59%9898+1.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.3%6381-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain246———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.7%5667-0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.3%5876-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04346067-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1384·79·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4086888-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,034,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.74290·92·+1.3
Hearing disability6.6%4662-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.2%2864+0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.2%6886-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.934%7981+0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate81.4%82·88·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.1%6785-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units5,545———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate37612·6·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$8,05272·73·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.4%6879-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain74.27282-0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,49228·30·-0.5
Jail population rate83.72·3·-1.3
Labour force7,082———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7%7084-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.2%1432+0.8CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.9 years5879+0.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0597—30·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$718k———Census local government finances
Loneliness32.8%4466-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents33.588·98·+1.5
Mammography in the past two years79.7%10095+1.4CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0690·93·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$85,3538081+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$54,03634·47·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,98410·27·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.3 min7678-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.5 years62·68·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77920·34·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$164,40026·46·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$73,421—75—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$73,5476676+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,80426·60·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.143%10095+2.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.88492+1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11%6081-0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99794·81·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.118·11·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.54416·21·-0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.3%4459+0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity39.6%2435+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,985———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.2254·37·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units4,058———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,780———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·55·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,750———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,0934467-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$95,0879897+4.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,111,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,694———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,658———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,588———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,978———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,184———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,620———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line827———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,003———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,657———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,398———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,857———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,562———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census12,012———
Poverty rate7.09%9894-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)8.8%8688-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3585681-0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,584———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,806———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,583———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,484———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,435———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,631———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,277———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population50%26·31·-0.7
Preventable hospital stays1,3278895-1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate29342·14·-0.4
Private job growth0.91940·37·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,391———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02336676+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.2%51·30·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents73.896·91·+1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200046.18·14·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2004456·10·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200839.510·10·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201244.412·15·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201662.332·33·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202065.952·42·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202468.852·44·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.794·90·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.2%48·50·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit8.72%8·9·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.4%86·89·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.02%46·75·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.4%46·32·+0.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%5477-0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.1%70·72·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.17%10·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.07%40·27·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.96%51·38·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.5%72·87·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.8%50·34·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.1%76·89·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.4%72·89·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.93%64·50·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.1%2236-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.8%6285-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.79582·90·+0.9
Stroke2.8%5076-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.5%58·36·+0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,620———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken17,451———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.8%5683-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population11,868———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed167———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.4%8489-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate10.1%32·28·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units560———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%5883-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,203———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain189———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,510———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost6,6596687-0.5County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.