placestats

Wahkiakum County, WA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4573
Density6.7people per km² of land
Median household income$57,091
Land area681km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wahkiakum County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bollinger County, MO, Coosa County, AL, Pike County, IL, Uvalde County, TX, Bates County, MO, Ashland County, WI, Presque Isle County, MI, Coos County, NH. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wahkiakum Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median home value$344,50098th pct by value89th pct by value +3.7 sd
Median household income (model-based)$69,726100th pct67th pct +3.3 sd
Mean travel time to work42.3 min2nd pct0th pct +3.1 sd
Business opening rate17.698th pct by value99th pct by value +3.0 sd
Share now married66.8%100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.8 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.040798th pct97th pct +2.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4436467+0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.9%8470-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain56,430 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9494-2.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.7%8061-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability31.8%7650-0.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.7398·88·+2.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.9%1219+1.2CDC PLACES
Binge drinking18.3%3638+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents052·45·-0.5
Business closing rate11.380·91·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments82———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate17.698·99·+3.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%66+1.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.1234·33·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.7%6440-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort426———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income426———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.8%69-1.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%9265-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.1%6040-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.5%6640+0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.628·53·-0.7
Coronary heart disease5.9%8047-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.9%88+1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%9272-1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.3%7457+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.7156·51·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Depression28.6%109+1.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.7%9070-1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.11676·50·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.9238873+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.90390·55·+1.2
Effective property tax rate0.60512·27·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,198———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents18.746·48·-0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health19.1%8657-0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.56774-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.32%3819-0.5County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population uncertain204———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.6%3629+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.3%5638-0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02347679-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11318·47·-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4563839+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$132,410k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.033586·54·+0.9
Hearing disability7.2%4834-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31%7666-0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.9%5854+0.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate84.8%96·96·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,207———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate67522·24·-0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,65274·69·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.7%8050-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1014643-0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,90939·46·-0.2
Jail population rate46451·57·-0.2
Labour force1,282———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy79.6 years10091+2.5County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents3.326·22·-0.7
Mammography in the past two years69.4%2818-0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.16864·45·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$73,0859063+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$64,36488·73·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$57,71284·66·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work42.3 min20+3.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age54.8 years96·98·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,086100·79·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$344,50098·89·+3.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,091—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,72610067+3.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,08492·69·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0749%5053-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.532230-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.2%8663-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.98810·28·-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate6.2998·96·+1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying3.02100·97·+2.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity19%10094-2.7CDC PLACES
Obesity39.4%5437+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,026———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents5.0688·85·+1.0
Owner-occupied housing units1,718———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,920———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return220·26·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,310———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,8797446+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$52,5735644+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$250,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,767———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,765———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,880———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,987———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,493———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,479———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain714———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line537———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,543———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,752———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,304———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher778———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,422———
Poverty rate uncertain15.7%3636+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.3%9268-1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality34010085-1.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,971———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,235———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,294———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,294———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,358———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,981———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,062———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population54.5%40·37·-0.1
Preventable hospital stays2,4815061-0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2112·7·-1.2
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04079897+2.7Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents31.210·13·-1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.344·41·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200453.428·27·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200849.630·27·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201250.622·24·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201661.824·32·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202059.920·30·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202459.316·26·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20243.078·29·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.67%92·72·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.2%0·22·-1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20.6%96·76·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.21%90·86·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year67.6%2·4·-2.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%7248-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over32.3%98·98·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain11.2%10·39·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain4.46%62·58·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain6.14%63·54·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.1%96·98·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%96·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married13.8%0·0·-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married66.8%100·99·+2.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain6.19%100·93·+2.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic84%52·56·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.2%64·76·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.3%8453+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.2%8276-1.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.19768·62·+0.4
Stroke3.2%5842-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.3%2·6·-2.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,140———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,688———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population4,573———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed84———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate6.6%23+2.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain8.2%2·18·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain181———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%7454-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50593———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,334———Census ACS 5-year

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.