placestats

Wabash County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,199
Density19.4people per km² of land
Median household income$53,650
Land area578km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wabash County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Clay County, NC, Montgomery County, KS, Neshoba County, MS, Henderson County, TN, Jay County, IN, Okmulgee County, OK, Bryan County, OK, Bath County, KY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wabash Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mean adjusted gross income per return$78,269100th pct72nd pct +3.8 sd
Economy score1.02100th pct by value62nd pct by value +3.7 sd
Median household income (model-based)$64,466100th pct55th pct +3.4 sd
Binge drinking20.6%0th pct15th pct +3.0 sd
Membership organisations21.6100th pct95th pct +3.0 sd
Effective property tax rate1.4798th pct by value86th pct by value +2.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.47210079+2.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.3%9379-1.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work110,330 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.9%6629-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability30.4%10060-2.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.14·13·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.6%8946-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.08586646+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.6%015+3.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents022·45·-0.7
Business closing rate3.940·3·-2.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments234———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.7530·40·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1319+0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.390·61·+0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.7%9451-1.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.276%56·70·+0.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,371———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,371———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.5%8062+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.5%9334-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.4%10062-2.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.1%5237-0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.770·75·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5.9%9847-2.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%7147-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.6%9343-1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.1%8651+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.822·6·-1.7IRS county migration flows
Depression24.4%6745-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%9155-1.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.24298·56·+2.2
Economic connectedness0.8579462+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8229251+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.02100·62·+3.7
Education score-0.014538·41·-0.1
Effective property tax rate1.4798·86·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,053———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents28.246·68·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health19.4%9354-1.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.52924+0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%6453+0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.5%9252-1.2CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain228———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.3%8235-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.6%9651-1.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06354651+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14286·90·+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.492612+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$437,240k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.12291·44·+1.1
Hearing disability6.7%9357-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.2%9855-1.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.7%9156-1.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%3740-0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate75.4%42·56·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.6%9253-1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units5,416———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,00617·49·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-13,5810·4·-2.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9%9644-1.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain70.710086-1.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,23147·56·-0.4
Jail population rate1420·8·-1.3
Labour force5,250———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.5%9553-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.6%6240-0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.4 years9663+1.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.3%6845-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents7.9672·61·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years70.8%3027-0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.052676·39·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$78,26910072+3.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,28336·19·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$58,86496·68·+2.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.8 min7853-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age43 years64·64·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77446·32·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$103,9008·11·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,650—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,46610055+3.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,52892·50·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0999%8080+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations21.610095+3.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.9%9653-1.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99994·96·+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.8190·93·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.27636·54·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.9%9871-2.0CDC PLACES
Obesity40.2%5128-0.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,784———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.0216·17·-1.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,606———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,280———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·55·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,683———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,3239864+2.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$55,3009854+2.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$610,070k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,032———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,942———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,179———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,679———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,796———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,463———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,541———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,527———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,940———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,604———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,637———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,458———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,361———
Poverty rate14.1%8646-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.4%8443-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4609655-1.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,508———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,006———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,782———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,134———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,464———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,593———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,377———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population10%0·4·-2.4
Preventable hospital stays4,1061410+0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate86449·73·-0.3
Private job growth-3.066·7·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,251———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02078466+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps15.9%41·70·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents47.552·50·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200063.276·64·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200470.688·78·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200856.940·47·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201268.668·67·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.976·72·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.276·71·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202477.364·67·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.230·69·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.66%20·14·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.3%0·36·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.4%98·67·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.66%52·46·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.3%18·49·-0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%9648-1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22%70·71·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain1.25%91·63·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced17.5%96·99·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.04%37·26·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.86%13·9·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.1%18·27·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.1%20·21·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married51.1%54·42·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.13%27·16·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.7%90·91·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.36%34·60·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.7%7633+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.6%8050-0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.672100·86·+2.4
Stroke3.2%9342-1.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.1%0·30·-1.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,830———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,066———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.5%9555-1.5CDC PLACES
Total population11,199———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed197———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.8%4036-0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain11.7%10·35·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain632———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%9654-1.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,295———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,641———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,3989870-1.7County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.