placestats

Traverse County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3279
Density2.2people per km² of land
Median household income$65,931
Land area1486km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Traverse County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Webster County, NE, Goshen County, WY, Pembina County, ND, Park County, MT, Sherman County, KS, Mills County, TX, Wheeler County, TX, Bear Lake County, ID. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Traverse Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Business closing rate00th pct by value2nd pct by value -3.4 sd
Business opening rate04th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.6 sd
Share widowed10.4%100th pct by value96th pct by value +2.3 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201247.76th pct by value19th pct by value -2.1 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200451.26th pct by value21st pct by value -2.0 sd
Colorectal cancer screening61.6%98th pct83rd pct +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.59410099+1.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.2%7465-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work21,670 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%7594-1.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.7%8888-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability29.6%5865-0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0456·31·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.1%9691-1.6CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2429589+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.7%3215+0.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain95.167·94·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.2
Business closing rate00·2·-3.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments109———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate04·2·-2.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%4644+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2278·84·+0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18%3049+0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.127%19·5·-0.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort532———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income532———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.6%6027+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%8877-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.1%5867-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.6%9883+2.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people32.746·77·-0.2
Coronary heart disease5.7%4657-0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%3860+0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%2041+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.5%8484+1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.7380·75·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Depression25.4%834+1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.7%5470-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.4556·66·+0.4
Economic connectedness1.027486+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4288·79·+1.2
Education score-0.96215·7·-1.1
Effective property tax rate0.97242·60·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,692———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents26.670·65·+0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health17.5%5672-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.86686-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.16%62-1.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14%3164-0.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain63———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.4%5273+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.3%6476-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.03789898-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13888·87·+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4384660+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$308,320k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.081140·46·-0.1
Hearing disability6.9%6648-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.4%8282-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.5%5082-0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate79.8%68·81·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.5%3767-0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units1,896———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate58217·17·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-35526·37·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%4866-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1222119+0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6092·6·-0.9
Jail population rate71.52·2·-1.1
Labour force1,739———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.6%2652+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.6%4063-0.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.09201-1.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy76.3 years4262+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.4%4383-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents15.952·86·-0.0
Mammography in the past two years76.3%8874+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.45642·62·-0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$75,5877267+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,01352·54·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$56,36862·62·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work17.1 min7890-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.5 years76·80·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$61710·7·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$110,10024·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$65,931—58—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,6347863+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,07012·29·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0516%1222-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations21.48495+0.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%6672-0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99212·39·-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate040·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.6914·4·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.2%6260-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity39.3%3438+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,410———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents020·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,125———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,900———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return242·59·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,601———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$38,4518474+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$82,7118694+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$262,610k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,175———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,136———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,676———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,467———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,297———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over828———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line321———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line413———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,177———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,037———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,838———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher401———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,360———
Poverty rate10.1%6176-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.6%3049+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain4474458-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,106———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,141———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,035———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,847———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,798———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,864———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,802———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population37.9%29·17·-0.6
Preventable hospital stays1,7318286-0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate51159·40·-0.0
Private job growth-1.9412·11·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs809———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02535081-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.3%69·31·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents64.556·83·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200054.910·36·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200451.26·21·-2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200847.26·22·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201247.76·19·-2.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201662.58·33·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202063.98·38·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202466.110·38·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.374·58·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.33%64·52·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.3%20·22·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25.3%72·91·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.33%86·78·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.3%32·16·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%4462-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.3%78·87·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain4.48%60·87·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.2%67·56·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.92%21·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race5.61%51·51·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.6%36·32·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.5%30·12·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.9%36·67·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.9%63·69·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic84.9%52·58·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.4%100·96·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17.5%1227-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.4%8287-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.94866·93·+0.6
Stroke3%4058-0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.5%38·23·+0.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,500———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,547———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.4%5172-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population3,279———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.039963-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed47———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%4679-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate25.6%74·83·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units486———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%6068-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50589———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain56———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,268———Census ACS 5-year

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.