placestats

Toole County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5028
Density1.0people per km² of land
Median household income$53,693
Land area4960km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Toole County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Graham County, KS, Upton County, TX, Lincoln County, CO, Cheyenne County, KS, Lane County, KS, Decatur County, KS, Colfax County, NM, Jewell County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Toole Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share in the same house a year ago80.5%0th pct by value5th pct by value -3.1 sd
Cholesterol screening76.1%2nd pct1st pct -2.3 sd
Binge drinking22.8%2nd pct4th pct +2.0 sd
Mean income of arriving households$31,7750th pct by value1st pct by value -1.9 sd
Routine checkup in the past year66.2%2nd pct by value2nd pct by value -1.8 sd
Homeownership rate64.6%6th pct by value15th pct by value -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5036087+0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.4%3625+0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work28,610 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%7894-1.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.6%2430+0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability34%3036+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.7476·65·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.1%3040+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.126872+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.8%24+2.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.8150·57·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments151———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate13.684·93·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%5253+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.8914·40·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.4%7858-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort759———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income759———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening76.1%21-2.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.9%2026+0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.6%3234+0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.7%3614-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people40.244·88·-0.1
Coronary heart disease6.5%1822+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%3834+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.4%1017+0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54.6%2631-0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.6840·21·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression23.7%3852+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.3%5257-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.46320·29·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.8493860-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.837653+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.6252·38·+0.0
Education score-0.22763·29·+0.1
Effective property tax rate0.96347·60·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,250———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents14.248·36·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health22.2%3033+0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.84986-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.18%183-1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.3%3138+0.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain172———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.6%2429+0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.1%2225+0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02363879+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11226·45·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4465249-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$511,220k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.41332·27·-0.2
Hearing disability8.7%125+1.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.4%5262-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.6%8891-1.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate64.6%6·15·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13%4648-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units2,323———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-10,2168·7·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.7%2431+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain86.210066-1.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,03616·15·-0.4
Jail population rate1555·9·-0.4
Labour force2,293———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.4%2927+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25%2035+0.8CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.3 years4240+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.6%4669-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents22.784·93·+0.8
Mammography in the past two years74.8%9462+1.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.12652·43·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,1815728-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$31,7750·1·-1.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,99020·13·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15 min8896-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age38.8 years12·26·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$75372·27·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$187,40072·57·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,693—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$52,3993420-0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,80596·60·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0918%5673-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.843842-0.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.1%3239+0.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99638·65·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.7578·92·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.0692·92·+1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.9%5855-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity35.4%7073-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,823———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents6.7380·91·+0.2
Owner-occupied housing units1,177———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,990———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return226·23·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,593———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,9772229-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,5897280+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$341,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,128———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,133———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,171———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,036———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,630———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over877———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain541———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line739———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,411———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,347———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,050———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher781———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,971———
Poverty rate uncertain12.3%6560-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)17%3627+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4886048-0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,378———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,311———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,121———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,102———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,037———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,119———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,046———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population20%27·7·-0.9
Preventable hospital stays1,2488696-1.1County Health Rankings
Private job growth1.4553·46·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,326———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03867896+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.5%60·55·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents49.542·55·-0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200072.254·86·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200469.642·75·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200864.142·66·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201271.246·74·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.850·76·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.446·72·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202479.150·72·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.8738·40·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.28%62·30·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.2%28·36·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.2%50·70·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.37%58·35·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year66.2%2·2·-1.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.3%2628+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over17.4%12·29·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain5.69%65·88·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.4%76·84·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain3.42%32·48·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.32%33·41·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago80.5%0·5·-3.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.4%82·64·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married50.2%26·36·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.94%64·70·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic83%54·54·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.01%2·13·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.5%5250-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.1%9688-1.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.21941·64·-0.3
Stroke3.6%1621+0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.4%22·11·-1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,190———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,593———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.6%4639-0.2CDC PLACES
Total population5,028———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.02454112-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed43———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.9%9097-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain21.5%42·75·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain500———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.8%3231+0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50786———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,905———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain10,3137346-0.6County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.