placestats

Mineral County, CO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population799
Density0.4people per km² of land
Median household income$52,455
Land area2268km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Mineral County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Wheeler County, OR, Mineral County, NV, Judith Basin County, MT, Camas County, ID, Liberty County, MT, Niobrara County, WY, Meagher County, MT, Kiowa County, CO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Mineral Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher54.5%100th pct98th pct +5.1 sd
Median home value$413,000100th pct by value94th pct by value +3.7 sd
Vacancy rate65.3%98th pct by value100th pct by value +3.0 sd
Mean income of arriving households$89,593100th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.8 sd
Median household income (model-based)$37,1080th pct1st pct -2.6 sd
No leisure-time physical activity14.9%100th pct99th pct -2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here uncertain0.29421-2.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.6%9888-1.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain4,805 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.333%5732-0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.3%9690-1.0CDC PLACES
Any disability25%9894-1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.2861·57·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.3%8480-0.9CDC PLACES
Binge drinking20%4620+0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.2
Business closing rate14.786·98·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments53———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.1742·46·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.9%00+1.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents10.954·59·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.1%7454-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort138———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.7%9880+2.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5%9692-1.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.2%9089-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.7%10077+2.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people57.876·97·+0.7
Coronary heart disease4.9%9891-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.8%5442-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking10.6%9896-1.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.6%9080+1.1CDC PLACES
Depression23.4%5055+0.0CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes7.3%10098-1.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.15100·95·+1.3
Economy score0.89866·55·+0.5
Effective property tax rate0.3547·4·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed396———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.650·31·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health13.4%10098-1.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.310099-0.9County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%9053+1.3County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress16.2%8088-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11%9694-1.4CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4793019+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$95,100k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.755100·92·+1.6
Hearing disability6.2%9878-1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure25.8%10098-1.9CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.7%6490-0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate73.7%44·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing units1,251———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability6.3%10096-1.3CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate2,51971·62·-0.1
Jail population rate44261·54·-0.2
Labour force409———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents18.580·90·+0.7
Mammography in the past two years75.2%9665+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.23652·49·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$74,8719166+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$89,593100·92·+2.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain14.3 min8297-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age53.7 years82·97·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$90390·60·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$413,000100·94·+3.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$52,455—22—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$37,10801-2.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,46278·47·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0545-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9%10097-1.5CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate-5.518·3·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity14.9%10099-2.5CDC PLACES
Obesity25.1%10098-2.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units434———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.8
Owner-occupied housing units320———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return870———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return212·13·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move717———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$41,95010084+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$78,2928292+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$72,968k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population932———BEA Regional Accounts
Population944———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over711———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over819———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over684———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over237———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain104———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line91———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined799———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined938———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago661———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher373———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census865———
Poverty rate uncertain13%4954-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.7%9282-1.1Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000486———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004619———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008623———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012650———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016652———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020756———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024753———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population68.1%58·55·+0.5
Preventable hospital stays1,3697794-0.6County Health Rankings
Private job growth10.796·97·+1.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs509———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents4236·36·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200063.617·66·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200462.819·55·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200855.319·41·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.213·31·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201659.213·27·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202057.410·26·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202456.88·22·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-6.828·8·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%50·5·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%18·1·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains26.5%66·93·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.1%50·11·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%10095-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over29.7%82·96·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.88%17·4·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago82.7%8·9·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married68.6%98·99·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90%68·73·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher54.5%10098+5.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.2%9692-1.3CDC PLACES
Stroke2.5%9894-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication50.7%4·4·-1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed490———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken404———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population799———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed13———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%5259-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate65.3%98·100·+3.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units817———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.5%10095-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain125———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute335———Census ACS 5-year

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.