placestats

Schuyler County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6826
Density6.0people per km² of land
Median household income$66,059
Land area1133km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Schuyler County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Kossuth County, IA, Phelps County, NE, Henderson County, IL, Itasca County, MN, Woodward County, OK, Cass County, MN, Calhoun County, IA, Thurston County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Schuyler Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share divorced17.9%100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.3 sd
Economic connectedness in high school0.5610th pct12th pct -2.8 sd
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%0th pct30th pct +2.5 sd
Poverty rate19.3%2nd pct20th pct +2.3 sd
Mammography in the past two years63.9%2nd pct2nd pct -2.3 sd
Effective property tax rate1.83100th pct by value95th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4321060-1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.3%5064-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work63,015 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.8%7075-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability31.2%2754+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.858·10·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.7%1345+1.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1761331-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.5%4016+0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.2
Business closing rate8.4858·49·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments142———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.1978·46·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3132+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.228·23·-1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.2%6069-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.181%51·25·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort790———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income790———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.1%9054+1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%030+2.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.7%4458+0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.1%816-1.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.796·85·+1.4
Coronary heart disease6.2%634+1.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%3356-0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.6%1532+0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.6%2248-0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.754·5·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Depression23.6%5053-0.0CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11%844+1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.10819·50·-0.6
Economic connectedness0.8393057-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.561012-2.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.8230·50·-0.6
Education score-0.26932·27·-0.3
Effective property tax rate1.83100·95·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,784———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.560·40·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health20.6%845+1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.91641+0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%3030-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.9%841+0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.2%1036+1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.8%1947+0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04115468-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1492·89·+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.427279-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$312,630k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.090615·46·-0.8
Hearing disability6.9%4048-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.1%638+1.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%1049+1.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%3840+0.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate79.5%74·80·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.7%841+1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units3,317———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,46091·74·+1.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-3,54328·22·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.1%642+1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1004445+0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,79887·78·+1.5
Jail population rate52572·63·+0.8
Labour force2,923———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9%1344+0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.9%326+1.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02734435-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy74.8 years2445-0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.4%1043+1.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents16.450·87·-0.0
Mammography in the past two years63.9%22-2.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.26924·51·-0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,6284051-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,5356·14·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,07818·30·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.6 min2654+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.8 years90·91·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$83660·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$106,2008·12·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$66,059—58—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,4445055-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,94064·65·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0953%7476+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.35685+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.3%1049+0.9CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain29.2916+1.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99898·85·+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.70668·46·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.097252·45·-0.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25%6062-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity40.2%2128+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,732———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0636·20·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,173———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return28·18·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,146———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,0772447-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$54,9432853-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$369,490k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,725———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,733———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,860———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,549———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,283———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,717———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,293———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line909———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,706———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,635———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,001———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,000———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,902———
Poverty rate19.3%220+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.7%2648+0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4942246+0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,772———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,031———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,823———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,890———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,828———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,906———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,759———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population30.4%2·12·-1.9
Preventable hospital stays1,4278693-1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate93592·77·+1.5
Private job growth-1.0916·16·-0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs994———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01832654-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps17.2%95·76·+2.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents34.220·19·-1.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.740·42·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.148·46·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200849.122·26·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.522·32·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201670.146·50·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202072.260·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.958·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202417.276·78·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0.958%0·6·-2.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.4%58·37·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains13.7%12·41·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.19%64·76·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.4%98·51·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.9%640+1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.2%84·87·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%12·24·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain4.44%93·51·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced17.9%100·99·+3.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.48%10·19·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.9%54·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%87·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.7%50·33·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married50.2%12·37·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90.7%68·75·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.21%22·34·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.9%2235-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.5%1451+1.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.16826·60·-0.6
Stroke3.3%635+1.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.8%52·41·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,130———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,925———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.3%1043+0.9CDC PLACES
Total population6,826———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01961917-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed139———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.8%813+1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate17.6%76·62·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units585———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.1%1545+0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,119———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,667———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain11,0152039+0.5County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.