placestats

Henderson County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6284
Density6.4people per km² of land
Median household income$65,651
Land area981km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Henderson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Phelps County, NE, Woodward County, OK, Itasca County, MN, Schuyler County, IL, Thurston County, NE, Iron County, UT, Kossuth County, IA, Cass County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Henderson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Gini index of income inequality0.368100th pct99th pct -3.3 sd
Trend in average test score-0.0540th pct1st pct -2.8 sd
Injury deaths1420th pct7th pct +2.2 sd
Homeownership rate85.5%100th pct by value97th pct by value +1.9 sd
Share widowed9.81%98th pct by value94th pct by value +1.9 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.141%94th pct95th pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.474878-0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.3%7779-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work70,115 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.375%4623+0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.5%6462-0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability29%7170-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.3930·18·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.9%3557+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1552034-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21%3113+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.1248·40·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments97———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.086·4·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3532+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.3510·24·-1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.3%5263-0.3Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.137%23·8·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort837———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income837———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.8%9867+1.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7%1343+0.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15%7768-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.1%3837-0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people26.654·64·+0.1
Coronary heart disease5.6%6963-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%3356+0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.9%6052-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.4%4664+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1854·35·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression23.9%4250+0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%6568-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.49475·68·+0.7
Economic connectedness0.8553861-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.702829-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.77726·48·-0.6
Education score-0.9667·7·-1.6
Effective property tax rate1.6894·93·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,042———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents5.618·9·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health18.4%4864-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.31431+0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.44%7660+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.3%4562-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.9%1943+0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13%5063-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03336674-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13586·85·+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.36810099-3.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$237,220k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.1854·65·+0.3
Hearing disability6.4%9871-1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.8%3858+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%1749+1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.825%2118-0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate85.5%100·97·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.8%3463-0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units3,374———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate79955·33·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-7,33114·11·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.4%4257+0.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain14207+2.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,33078·74·+1.0
Jail population rate23239·21·-0.6
Labour force3,185———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%5367-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.1%1634+1.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.056839-1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.3 years6073+0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.7%340+1.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents17.864·89·+0.2
Mammography in the past two years69.8%2620-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.80384·82·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$65,6162241-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,27312·19·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$52,60454·51·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.6 min627+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age49.8 years96·93·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$83458·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$101,6002·9·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$65,651—57—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$62,6103249-0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,70350·56·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.141%9495+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.43256-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.1%5665-0.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99424·53·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-3.058·7·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.7910·15·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity22.9%8378-0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity38.7%5245+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,662———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0324·18·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,277———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,280———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return214·30·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,939———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,7632845-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,9134259-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$347,450k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,105———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,088———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,309———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,976———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,725———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,678———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain714———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line797———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,179———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,038———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,761———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher909———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,387———
Poverty rate uncertain11.6%6465-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.2%3453+0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4085669-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,866———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,153———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,814———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,568———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,518———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,647———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,464———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population88.9%77·86·+1.0
Preventable hospital stays2,6684254+0.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate56766·47·+0.1
Private job growth1.4648·46·-0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs763———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0141425-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps14.1%82·58·+0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents25.84·6·-1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200045.74·13·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2004454·10·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2008414·12·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201243.86·14·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201665.114·39·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202066.916·44·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202469.820·46·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202424.194·92·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.4%2·10·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.6%38·31·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains14%18·42·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.9%82·91·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.2%88·48·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%6367-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.7%94·91·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.6%29·30·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.94%4·11·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.7%96·89·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%86·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.5%14·12·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.1%74·80·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.98%54·40·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.1%92·92·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.81%98·94·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.2%3037-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.8%2856+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.041324·52·-0.8
Stroke3%4858-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.5%21·23·-0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,860———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,544———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.6%5068-0.3CDC PLACES
Total population6,284———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.05401-2.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed143———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.5%1218+1.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate21.1%84·74·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units712———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%6568-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,118———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,539———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,4155269-0.3County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.