placestats

Ritchie County, WV

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8372
Density7.2people per km² of land
Median household income$50,256
Land area1171km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Ritchie County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Craig County, OK, Perry County, MS, Haskell County, OK, Marion County, GA, McCurtain County, OK, Perry County, TN, Barton County, MO, Pike County, AR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Ritchie Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents23.8100th pct by value94th pct by value +5.1 sd
Frequent mental distress24.3%0th pct1st pct +3.8 sd
Arthritis33.4%0th pct0th pct +3.6 sd
Share of suicides by firearm100%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd
Firearm share of suicides, standardised176100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.7 sd
Depression32.8%0th pct1st pct +2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4175848+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.4%9050-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work85,530 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.1%4615+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability39.2%4011+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.750·9·-1.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis33.4%00+3.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2524621-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking15.9%4675-0.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents042·45·-0.7
Business closing rate6.5110·13·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments169———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.5112·10·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%619+1.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.9236·13·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain24.5%6622-0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.122%0·4·-1.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,633———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,633———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.4%6741+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease10.4%02+2.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.8%84+1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.3%6839+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people48.694·94·+1.5
Coronary heart disease7.4%65+1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.6%03+1.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking23.7%22+1.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year45.9%87-0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.9414·28·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression32.8%01+2.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.3%3316+0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.0733·12·-0.3
Economic connectedness0.7888146+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.4423-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4592·29·+1.4
Education score0.0016145·43·-0.1
Effective property tax rate0.64956·32·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,092———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents9.34·20·-1.6
Fair or poor self-rated health26.9%810+1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter77663-0.8County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised176100·100·+2.7CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate20.584·93·+0.8CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%6840+0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity19.8%7026-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress24.3%01+3.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17.4%04+2.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.003298789-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13884·88·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4456251-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$755,580k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.919·8·-0.9
Hearing disability8.1%4411-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure39.1%4012+0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol37.5%00+2.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%6275+0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate84.3%94·96·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.2%7328-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units4,187———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate74610·29·-1.0
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,87718·29·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.1%67+1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1262516+0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate63913·7·-0.7
Jail population rate33925·38·-0.6
Labour force3,252———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.8%7323-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.6%7340-0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.03433926-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.3 years7430+0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness35.9%3525+0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents23.8100·94·+5.1
Mammography in the past two years74.9%9863+1.3CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.41964·21·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$63,7448836+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,48452·26·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,36088·39·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work31.8 min1210+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.2 years86·86·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5834·4·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$107,80018·13·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$50,256—17—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,1109226+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill70044·12·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0837%5864-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations114852-0.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17.1%4013+0.3CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain23.16830-0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99766·79·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate046·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.194·9·-1.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity35.5%87+1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity42.4%2112+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,327———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents018·11·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units2,803———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,430———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return224·56·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,780———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$26,3363414-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,2029857+2.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$460,130k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,187———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,167———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)8,255———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over7,047———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,554———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,197———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,953———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,785———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,433———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,234———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,096———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,715———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher796———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,444———
Poverty rate21.7%1613+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)17.7%6623-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5687630-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,812———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,196———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,846———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,788———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,075———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,283———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,050———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population64.8%58·51·+0.2
Preventable hospital stays4,254108+1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate47014·34·-0.9
Private job growth-1.128·16·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,516———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01513032-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps22.8%93·91·+1.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents34.122·19·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200072.696·87·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.392·85·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200873.686·87·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201279.296·90·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201687.396·95·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.296·94·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248796·94·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.424·69·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.3%10·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.6%14·62·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.07%28·14·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.15%86·86·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.7%81·80·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.6%6320-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.3%78·79·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.4%14·43·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.2%86·91·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.4%30·23·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.4%80·70·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm100%100·100·+2.9CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.88%0·11·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic96.6%100·99·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.81%58·85·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher12.8%167-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours44.8%02+1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.29140·31·-0.2
Stroke3.7%5817-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication61.3%75·85·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,860———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,854———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off13.5%3013+0.6CDC PLACES
Total population8,372———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed160———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.9%1812+0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.5%50·72·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units860———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6%7127-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,578———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,686———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,1506728-0.3County Health Rankings

5of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.