placestats

Richland County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population15,675
Density16.8people per km² of land
Median household income$60,404
Land area932km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Richland County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Polk County, TN, Coos County, OR, Bedford County, PA, Manistee County, MI, Washington County, KY, Jasper County, GA, Allegany County, NY, Itawamba County, MS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Richland Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Returns reporting capital gains22.7%100th pct by value84th pct by value +2.2 sd
Binge drinking20.9%2nd pct13th pct +1.9 sd
Colorectal cancer screening51.6%4th pct9th pct -1.9 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.142nd pct by value9th pct by value -1.6 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.5%96th pct77th pct -1.5 sd
Membership organisations17.594th pct89th pct +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.448465+0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.1%9082-0.9CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work140,740 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.5%9677-1.5CDC PLACES
Any disability29.9%8863-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.6710·8·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.6%6146-0.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.07496148+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.9%213+1.9CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain68.861·78·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents034·45·-0.7
Business closing rate7.3424·25·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments395———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed29———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened29———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.3424·18·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2919+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.176·60·+0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.1%7054-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.174%8·21·-1.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,942———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,942———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.9%6869+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.2%5640-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.1%8867-1.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.6%49-1.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people2458·57·-0.0
Coronary heart disease5.7%8857-1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%4447-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16%7151-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.2%8468+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.8138·24·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression24.5%5144-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.9%8566-1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.39493·63·+1.2
Economic connectedness0.8136052+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8959664+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.64460·40·+0.1
Education score-0.47512·18·-1.1
Effective property tax rate1.5280·88·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed7,374———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents21.954·56·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health18.6%8562-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.62721+0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.49%8878+1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.6%8859-0.8CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain226———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.2%4936-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.2%7859-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04237068-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13692·85·+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4148484-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$753,310k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.026763·54·+0.5
Hearing disability6.5%8867-1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.4%8562-1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.8%6155-0.4CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.825%1018-1.0County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate73.6%30·46·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.1%8460-0.8CDC PLACES
Housing units7,366———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate96633·46·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-86022·34·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.6%7152-0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths85.97667-0.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,55148·62·-0.3
Jail population rate33325·37·-0.6
Labour force7,683———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%8863-0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.7%4739+0.0CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0174649-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.7 years2633-0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness34.4%4743-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.782·74·+0.8
Mammography in the past two years72%3436-0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.53886·67·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$66,8086045+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,8418·13·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,7014·19·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.4 min8677-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.5 years44·60·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$75430·28·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$106,60010·13·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,404—42—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,1192033-0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,61860·54·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.059%3030-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.59489+1.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.4%8860-1.1CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain24.62926+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99880·84·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate040·35·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.142·9·-1.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23%9377-1.3CDC PLACES
Obesity39.5%3236+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,401———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents086·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents1.7666·49·-0.0
Owner-occupied housing units4,709———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return13,300———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return240·33·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move12,532———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,1564641-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,5708048+0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$830,440k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population15,502———BEA Regional Accounts
Population15,488———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over12,740———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over12,015———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over10,921———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,211———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,823———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,996———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined15,328———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined15,237———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago13,766———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,060———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census15,813———
Poverty rate11.9%8062-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.1%7853-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5473035+0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20007,428———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20047,749———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20087,650———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20127,282———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20167,684———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20208,063———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,755———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population59.4%49·43·+0.0
Preventable hospital stays3,0653236+0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate63434·54·-0.4
Private job growth-1.722·12·-1.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,966———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01944661-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps14.4%41·61·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents45.564·44·+0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200065.486·72·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200467.180·68·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200857.652·49·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.864·62·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201678.474·74·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202076.972·70·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202477.160·67·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.736·59·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.67%20·15·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.8%38·47·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.7%100·84·+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.23%60·62·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.3%39·49·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%7657-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.5%60·58·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.5%96·93·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.44%28·14·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.9%19·10·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.8%48·46·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.1%42·37·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married50.8%36·40·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.96%55·40·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.94%66·61·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.7%86·90·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.5%45·62·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.9%5235-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.2%6254-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.32582·71·+0.9
Stroke3%8858-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.5%15·23·-0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed7,170———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken22,845———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.9%8863-1.0CDC PLACES
Total population15,675———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.0198817-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed309———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4%5030-0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate13.1%38·42·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units965———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%8864-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 503,125———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain215———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute6,916———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,9943839+0.1County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.