placestats

Pulaski County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5074
Density9.8people per km² of land
Median household income$43,227
Land area516km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pulaski County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Jackson Parish, LA, Lawrence County, MS, Terrell County, GA, Clay County, WV, Sharp County, AR, Lawrence County, AR, Calhoun County, MS, Alexander County, IL. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pulaski Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Incarceration rate7,114100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.5 sd
Jail population rate6,61996th pct by value99th pct by value +2.9 sd
Unemployment rate7.2%2nd pct2nd pct +2.4 sd
Jail admission rate9,09496th pct by value95th pct by value +2.1 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.350th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.1 sd
Vacancy rate34.6%94th pct by value93rd pct by value +1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3856826+0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.7%7737-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work46,925 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over20%8424-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability36.5%8923-1.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.6724·24·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.7%7721-0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.6282-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.2%456+1.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents3.8938·84·-0.5
Black-white residential segregation26.928·10·-0.6County Health Rankings
Business closing rate10.484·84·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments75———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.22·4·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.3%5784-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents020·6·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain35.4%244+0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.472%77·96·+0.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,316———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,316———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.1%4736-0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.3%497-0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.4%8925-1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.2%1212-1.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people44.378·92·+0.8
Coronary heart disease7%6810-0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.7%2311+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.7%5510-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year51.4%8619+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.0286·80·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression23.3%5356-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes14.5%558-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.99183·14·+1.0
Economic connectedness0.6496018+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.034574·12·+0.6
Education score-1.278·4·-1.7
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.82574·50·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,575———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents53.780·95·+1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health26.7%7011-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.62721+0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%8040+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity27.3%498+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.9%4711-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16%6614-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.000459490-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13634·85·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4419056-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$201,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.69470·14·+0.7
Hearing disability7.1%7739-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.7%8313-1.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%8949-1.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate67.5%22·21·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity21.1%498+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units2,845———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate7,114100·100·+6.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,31258·49·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12%557-0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1302413+0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate9,09496·95·+2.1
Jail population rate6,61996·99·+2.9
Labour force1,698———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation13.8%548-0.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support29.8%427+0.3CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02935532-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy71.6 years6616+0.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness37.2%6515-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents4.642·34·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years66.5%47-1.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.1750·7·-0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$53,9876211+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,38158·12·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$40,06964·8·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29.8 min3817+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.7 years54·61·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$62518·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$81,0006·2·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$43,227—8—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,8639416+1.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain66854·11·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0555%6825+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations189290+1.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17.5%8111-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99516·57·-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-5.22·3·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.350·2·-2.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.9%9122-1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity45.7%133+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,862———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.9142·30·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,257———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,970———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return214·42·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,578———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,463309-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$47,8537426+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$237,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,957———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,911———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,242———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,909———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,549———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,154———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,286———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,065———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,921———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,755———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,464———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher423———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,193———
Poverty rate26.1%207+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)22.4%489-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6516616-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,016———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,108———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,270———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,003———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,735———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,624———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,381———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population78.5%65·72·+0.6
Preventable hospital stays3,4655023-0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate4958·38·-1.1
Private job growth-1.6724·12·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs531———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02469880+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps30.2%93·98·+1.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.170·81·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200048.538·18·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200455.660·32·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200849.334·26·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20125338·28·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201663.544·36·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202065.648·41·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202467.344·41·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202418.856·82·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.9%26·20·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit21.8%14·79·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9%66·14·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.37%74·65·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year76.8%30·68·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.7%477-0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.7%72·76·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic32.3%44·89·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.4%64·73·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88%22·48·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.8%44·65·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married47.8%54·24·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.86%82·68·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic61.7%44·24·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.99%24·73·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher11.9%224-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.7%448+0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.13794·40·+1.4
Stroke4.4%455+0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.8%17·82·-0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,110———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,786———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off15.2%477+0.0CDC PLACES
Total population5,074———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02481812-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed123———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate7.2%22+2.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate34.6%94·93·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units983———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.5%5310-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,061———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,574———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,4638025-0.9County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.