placestats

Pawnee County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6220
Density3.2people per km² of land
Median household income$63,625
Land area1954km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pawnee County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Castro County, TX, Thayer County, NE, Calhoun County, AR, Antelope County, NE, Roberts County, SD, Charles Mix County, SD, Walworth County, SD, Runnels County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pawnee Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Effective property tax rate1.7998th pct by value95th pct by value +2.2 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.0 sd
Injury deaths1512nd pct5th pct +1.9 sd
Share divorced15.9%96th pct by value95th pct by value +1.8 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.294th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.7 sd
Preventable hospital stays99796th pct98th pct -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4523071-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.9%4245-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain50,570 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.6%6055-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability31.2%5054-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.5232·21·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.8%6873-0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.0736464+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.2%5639-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents1.2290·67·+0.2
Black-white residential segregation4.44—0·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate6.416·12·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments127———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.660·54·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.9%7264-0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents12.958·65·-0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15%7265-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort777———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income777———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.3%5223+0.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.4%5259-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.6%6060-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.1%7246+0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people3250·76·-0.1
Coronary heart disease5.8%4852-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.8%7685-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%2641+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.8%8071+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.8278·77·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression20.5%8486-0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10%5264-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.34460·61·+0.6
Economic connectedness0.956577+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8796361+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.82744·51·+0.1
Education score0.056643·47·+0.0
Effective property tax rate1.7998·95·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,682———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents21.154·54·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health18.4%5864-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.55174-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.32%5619-0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.6%6068-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17%7679-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.4%7474-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04264967-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11526·50·-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4751422+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$354,660k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.14680·62·+0.8
Hearing disability7.1%5039-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.1%4056+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.4%3461+0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate64.1%8·14·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%4356-0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units3,045———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate99758·49·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$4,39848·59·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.8%7470-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain15125+1.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,68533·37·-0.5
Jail population rate19523·15·-0.9
Labour force2,753———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.6%6371-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.8%4661-0.2CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02354039-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.6 years4654+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.1%4975-0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents17.472·89·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years73.1%7046+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.32555·54·+0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$63,1261834-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,89528·27·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,49720·18·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.2 min5478-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.9 years72·77·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$80650·41·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$102,40012·10·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$63,625—51—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,7046856+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,83262·61·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.104%6482+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.33455-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.3%5661-0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99540·56·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.288·84·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.294·2·-1.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.8%4047-0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity38%5451+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,415———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0336·18·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,549———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,000———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return224·34·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,446———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,3189076+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$51,0872238-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$309,990k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,068———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,126———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,451———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,127———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,868———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,376———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain608———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line685———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,417———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,352———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,267———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher914———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,253———
Poverty rate uncertain11.2%6967-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.8%5456-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5162842+0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,940———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,988———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,879———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,608———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,661———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,739———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,675———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+2.0
Preventable hospital stays9979698-1.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate80371·69·+0.2
Private job growth-1.3820·14·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,285———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01963861-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.6%11·10·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents52.750·63·-0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200065.644·72·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200473.864·84·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200868.860·77·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201271.950·76·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201676.740·69·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202076.136·68·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202476.232·64·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.658·55·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.97%58·45·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.7%72·58·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16%38·54·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%30·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.4%58·32·+0.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%6262-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.1%52·72·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic6.85%—61·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.9%96·95·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.68%50·65·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.7%28·18·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married28.7%66·54·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married49.3%20·32·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.15%20·17·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic81.7%46·52·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.13%24·32·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.8%3234-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.3%3860+0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.36448·73·-0.1
Stroke3%6058-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%86·70·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,690———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,039———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.9%3750+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population6,220———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed71———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%6683-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.7%54·72·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units630———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%7268-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,117———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,500———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,5503344+0.0County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.