placestats

Owen County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,270
Density12.4people per km² of land
Median household income$59,706
Land area908km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Owen County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Ellis County, KS, Henry County, AL, Adams County, WI, Delaware County, NY, Kalkaska County, MI, Lincoln County, OK, Buckingham County, VA, Pulaski County, IN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Owen Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mean travel time to work41.7 min2nd pct1st pct +2.3 sd
Injury deaths1466th pct6th pct +1.7 sd
Safety score-1.593rd pct by value7th pct by value -1.7 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.5%0th pct6th pct +1.6 sd
Per capita personal income$41,8178th pct7th pct -1.5 sd
Motor vehicle crash deaths32.69th pct10th pct +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3972234-0.7Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work182,420 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.5%06+1.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over19.3%4027+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.4652·61·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Average test score-0.08456047+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents044·45·-0.7
Business closing rate8.9166·59·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments124———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.7260·56·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents1.7732·20·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.9%6244-0.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,607———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,607———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening60.6%8876+1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.976·76·+0.6
Dental visit in the past year54.9%2832-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.9962·58·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Drug overdose deaths uncertain50.61715+0.8County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.8687663+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.5511211-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4320·28·-0.8
Education score0.30263·63·+0.4
Effective property tax rate0.74649·43·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,736———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents43.786·88·+1.1
Fine particulate matter8.34231+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%5644+0.0County Health Rankings
Friending bias0.03666071-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13484·84·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4237675-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$241,790k———BEA Regional Accounts
High school graduation0.925%7275+0.5County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate87.8%100·99·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing units5,378———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,96948·52·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths14666+1.7County Health Rankings
Labour force4,938———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy72.6 years1824-0.9County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0609—30·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$274k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents4.3436·32·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years74.5%7459+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.260·47·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$62,4004032-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$52,89654·44·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,92764·41·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work41.7 min21+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.5 years44·60·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77536·33·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$165,00059·46·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,706—39—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,8689456+1.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,23150·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0559%2226-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations10.63450-0.4County Health Rankings
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain32.6910+1.5County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99564·61·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.8158·48·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.47252·62·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units4,261———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents012·11·-1.0
Owner-occupied housing units3,743———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,560———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return282·84·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,264———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,0712430-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$41,81787-1.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$472,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,309———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,313———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,252———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,968———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,878———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,233———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,913———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,726———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,152———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,208———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,646———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,361———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,278———
Poverty rate17.2%2029+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.4%3836+0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5733229+0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,070———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,741———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,751———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,557———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,001———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,456———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,500———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,3466066-0.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate86980·73·+0.7
Private job growth-1.3212·14·-0.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs972———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0236875+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents49.864·56·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200064.978·70·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.664·63·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.766·64·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.462·62·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.972·73·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.680·78·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.884·80·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.860·77·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.33%32·31·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit18%64·64·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.73%20·18·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.69%44·47·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Safety score-1.593·7·-1.7
Share aged 65 and over19.8%36·51·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.6%36·45·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.47%30·19·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.6%24·23·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%96·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.8%28·27·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.8%92·78·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.72%31·33·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.1%92·92·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.83%35·48·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17.3%4026-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.8%2420+0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.22230·35·-0.5
Tax returns filed4,730———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken18,830———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population11,270———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed202———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.1%3827+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.8%66·73·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,117———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 502,290———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,375———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,5461625+1.0County Health Rankings

4of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.