placestats

Osceola County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6114
Density5.9people per km² of land
Median household income$69,138
Land area1033km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Osceola County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Polk County, MN, Palo Alto County, IA, Renville County, MN, Callahan County, TX, Noble County, OK, Lea County, NM, Jackson County, MN, Craig County, VA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Osceola Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Children in single-parent households0.285%98th pct by value73rd pct by value +2.4 sd
Preventable hospital stays652100th pct99th pct -2.1 sd
Poverty rate16.3%6th pct33rd pct +1.8 sd
Lacking social and emotional support25.7%5th pct28th pct +1.6 sd
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.1%6th pct42nd pct +1.6 sd
Share in the same house a year ago92.6%98th pct by value94th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5417694+0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.3%2451+0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work58,030 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.4%6478-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability30.3%2861+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.1718·14·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.7%3660+0.5CDC PLACES
Binge drinking21.5%2810+0.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.5566·72·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments176———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.336·18·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%8453-0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.238·60·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1716%2860+0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.285%98·73·+2.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort904———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income904———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.2%1411-1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.1%642+1.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.1%1853+0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.8%4252-0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people30.784·73·+0.9
Coronary heart disease6%842+1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%5269-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18%628+1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.1%5678+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.2460·36·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression21.7%8274-0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%652+1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.1820·53·-0.8
Economic connectedness0.9414276-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9075867+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.1854·70·+0.1
Effective property tax rate1.0558·66·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,503———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents14.952·38·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health20.1%848+1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.55474-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.45%7063+0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16%1348+0.8CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population331———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.3%2855+0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.5%1853+0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06793047+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12974·78·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.434668-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$491,610k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.44372·80·+0.6
Hearing disability7.2%1434+0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.8%1858+0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.7%2669+0.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78%48·71·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%1856+0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units2,867———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2480·1·-1.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-4,66724·18·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.5%2054+0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1062436+0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,98268·48·+0.1
Jail population rate11013·5·-1.1
Labour force3,573———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.5%2553+0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support25.7%528+1.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.8 years5478+0.2County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0711—32·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$284k———Census local government finances
Loneliness34.3%1045+1.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents23.770·94·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years80.2%9696+1.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.4222·60·-0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$73,2994263-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,33316·25·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$52,00026·48·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21 min5873-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.5 years54·68·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$79640·38·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$123,80012·24·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$69,138—66—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$72,5698874+1.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,30210·39·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0535%1023-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations19.97093+0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.8%1655+0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99336·46·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.2528·10·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.074·11·-1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.8%1040+0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity40.1%2029+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,606———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents016·11·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,032———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,430———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return266·61·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,944———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,1425468+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$61,7305672-0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$371,370k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,016———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,978———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,917———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,643———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,305———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,347———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line981———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line618———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,006———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,886———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,662———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher661———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,192———
Poverty rate16.3%633+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.5%5675-0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3864674-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,063———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,266———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,127———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,194———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,213———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,328———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,245———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population50%30·31·-0.6
Preventable hospital stays65210099-2.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1384·2·-1.1
Private job growth6.896·92·+1.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,355———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01812252-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.4%88·54·+0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents49.846·56·-0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.380·81·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.180·79·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200866.276·70·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127174·73·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.190·85·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.890·84·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.584·83·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.252·65·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.21%50·50·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.7%22·18·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.5%70·84·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.79%28·50·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%58·36·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%1048+0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22%54·71·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0.949%70·53·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.9%47·35·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born5.41%73·65·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race10.1%75·69·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.6%98·94·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%89·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.3%48·30·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.1%58·80·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.47%38·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic85.1%36·58·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.69%45·45·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.4%616-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.8%4479+0.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.46244·78·-0.2
Stroke3.2%842+1.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.3%82·50·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,800———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,705———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.2%1859+0.6CDC PLACES
Total population6,114———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01347172+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed70———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2%9495-1.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain9.1%14·23·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain261———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%1652+0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,009———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,766———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,2923471+0.1County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.