placestats

Osborne County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3473
Density1.5people per km² of land
Median household income$59,408
Land area2312km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Osborne County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Greeley County, NE, Yuma County, CO, Kimball County, NE, Rush County, KS, Big Horn County, WY, Tripp County, SD, Adams County, ID, Concho County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Osborne Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Pretrial share of the jail population0%3rd pct by value2nd pct by value -2.5 sd
Membership organisations34.498th pct100th pct +2.1 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.394th pct by value0th pct by value -2.0 sd
Private job growth-8.222nd pct by value2nd pct by value -2.0 sd
Social connection score1.9194th pct by value99th pct by value +1.7 sd
Jail admission rate74.20th pct by value1st pct by value -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5074288-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.8%8471-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work24,850 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.4%9484-1.4CDC PLACES
Any disability30.9%6057-0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.8710·2·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.9%4457+0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3129094+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18%6042-0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate5.6410·7·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments125———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed7———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.2626·17·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1832+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.646·62·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.3%7663-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.186%56·27·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort538———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income538———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.4%5624+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.8%4649+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.9%6256-0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.8%6026+0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people54.372·96·+0.7
Coronary heart disease6%4242+0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%6265-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.6%3643+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.7%6665+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.2674·65·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression22.3%5866-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10%5064-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.26768·57·+0.5
Economic connectedness0.9796381+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.695728-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.86166·53·+0.1
Education score0.20276·56·+0.5
Effective property tax rate1.6182·91·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,606———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.348·49·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health18.2%7066-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.24479-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.33%5422+0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.1%7873-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.2%3457+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.7%7268-0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.01737495-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13376·83·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4276271-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$249,850k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.1246·44·+0.0
Hearing disability7.3%5031-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.4%4662-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.2%4063+0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.4%40·62·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.5%5667-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units2,027———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate4456·9·-1.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-9,85516·7·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.2%7261-0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1104832-0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate74.20·1·-1.7
Jail population rate24724·23·-0.8
Labour force1,647———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.4%6976-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.7%4474-0.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0473614-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.7 years5055-0.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0102—18·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$19k———Census local government finances
Loneliness30.3%8193-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents20.870·92·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years73.4%6849+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.55177·68·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,5104238-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,52238·26·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$57,37682·65·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work14.7 min8696-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.8 years60·85·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5912·5·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$84,70012·3·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,408—39—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,6381425-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,36544·42·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.124%7291+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations34.498100+2.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.7%5656-0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99872·85·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.6170·65·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.394·0·-2.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.9%5246-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity39.2%3639+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,609———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents036·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,230———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,080———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return244·48·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,859———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,6557465+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,1946879+0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$227,710k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,440———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,427———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,847———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,619———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,504———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over914———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain419———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line401———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,364———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,314———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,035———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher577———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,500———
Poverty rate uncertain12.5%5758-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.1%7261-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain4385660-0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,030———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,075———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,930———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,838———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,788———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,945———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,774———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%3·2·-2.5
Preventable hospital stays3,6401618+0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1982·5·-1.0
Private job growth-8.222·2·-2.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs915———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03016290+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.1%13·13·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents51.736·60·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200074.760·90·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200477.868·91·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200878.780·94·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20128278·94·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201686.268·93·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202085.366·92·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248560·90·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.244·54·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.85%36·19·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.3%30·30·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25.3%74·90·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%52·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.7%88·42·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%7262-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.3%64·90·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.5%86·92·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.68%9·22·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.4%50·41·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.6%40·13·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.2%28·55·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.08%30·44·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.8%90·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.75%63·84·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23%6757+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.7%6479-0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.9194·99·+1.7
Stroke3%6458-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.9%100·75·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,620———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken4,149———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.9%3850+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population3,473———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed41———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6086-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20.6%49·72·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units418———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%7868-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50621———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,687———Census ACS 5-year

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.