placestats

Osage County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population15,780
Density8.6people per km² of land
Median household income$70,216
Land area1827km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Osage County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Brown County, SD, Glenn County, CA, Hubbard County, MN, Essex County, NY, Pine County, MN, Chippewa County, MN, Flathead County, MT, Butler County, IA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Osage Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Private job growth40.8100th pct by value100th pct by value +10.8 sd
Share divorced15.9%98th pct by value95th pct by value +2.5 sd
Life expectancy73.7 years6th pct33rd pct -1.8 sd
Premature mortality5228th pct40th pct +1.6 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.123%88th pct91st pct +1.5 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.38696th pct97th pct -1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4522471-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.2%4865-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work198,540 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16.5%1642+1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability32%1848+0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.1668·55·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.7%1445+0.9CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1797581+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.3%8238-0.9CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain58.133·55·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents078·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.7152·55·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments233———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened27———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.884·83·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%4432+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.2114·33·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.4%4873-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.185%60·27·+0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,036———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,036———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%3231-0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%2452+0.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.1%2053+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.6%2841-0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people19.738·45·-0.5
Coronary heart disease5.7%2857+0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%4865-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.7%1842+0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.7%4270+0.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.766·51·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression22.6%6063-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.6%4472-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.30630·59·-0.4
Economic connectedness1.017284+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8524557-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.85422·53·-0.8
Education score0.55479·78·+0.8
Effective property tax rate1.690·91·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed7,796———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.566·50·+0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health17.9%4268-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.81216+0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.49%7678+0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.8%5976-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain156———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.2%4057+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.4%6674-0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.018686-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10822·37·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3869697-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$415,740k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.14836·62·-0.5
Hearing disability7.1%1239+0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.4%1653+0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.4%1246+1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.93%7477+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate80.1%74·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.2%4971-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units7,293———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate46123·10·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,27268·71·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%4666-0.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths88.54463+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,53230·31·-0.5
Jail population rate18424·13·-0.7
Labour force8,029———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.1%6882-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.6%8377-0.9CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.01686950-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.7 years633-1.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.4%9592-1.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents9.7634·70·-0.5
Mammography in the past two years73.4%3649-0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.86272·85·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$66,6882444-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$53,59840·46·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$46,32612·28·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29 min2020+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.8 years52·62·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$81042·42·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$142,80022·33·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$70,216—68—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,6664867+0.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,28264·73·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.123%8891+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations10.22245-0.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.5%3059+0.3CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain20.81839+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.98918·31·-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.0592·83·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.46162·62·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.4%3250+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity41.5%817+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,362———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents090·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents0.0632·20·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units5,099———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return14,330———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return260·60·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move12,785———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,6172249-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,4621847-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$844,580k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population15,798———BEA Regional Accounts
Population15,824———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over12,826———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over12,172———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over11,006———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,250———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,709———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,688———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined15,538———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined15,630———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago14,117———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,311———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census15,766———
Poverty rate11%4069+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.8%5072-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality522840+1.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,613———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20047,463———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20087,544———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,906———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20167,046———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20208,035———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,892———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.4
Preventable hospital stays2,3314667-0.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate27727·13·-0.6
Private job growth40.8100·100·+10.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,638———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02265473-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.5%12·9·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents33.516·18·-1.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200059.854·53·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.466·63·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200865.578·69·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.166·60·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201673.466·59·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202072.866·59·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202474.766·59·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.874·70·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.56%32·36·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.1%64·35·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains16.1%24·54·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.89%32·53·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.5%54·40·+0.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%4267-0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.6%42·60·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.9%98·95·+2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain0.989%5·5·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.24%33·29·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.5%62·68·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.6%26·18·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.2%28·62·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.31%60·52·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.44%65·36·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.4%78·83·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.26%20·35·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21%4247-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.1%7088-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.54466·82·+0.2
Stroke2.9%4067-0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%88·64·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed7,410———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken24,286———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.5%2455+0.7CDC PLACES
Total population15,780———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed233———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%6072-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate12.8%57·40·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units931———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.2%5276-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 503,133———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain182———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute6,852———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,6341043+1.4County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.