placestats

Newton County, IN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,859
Density13.3people per km² of land
Median household income$68,596
Land area1041km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Newton County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Asotin County, WA, Carroll County, IA, Oneida County, WI, Nelson County, VA, Hancock County, ME, Lewis County, WA, Lincoln County, WI, Oglethorpe County, GA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Newton Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Obesity43.3%0th pct8th pct +2.3 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.6%0th pct11th pct +2.2 sd
Safety score-1.13rd pct by value15th pct by value -2.1 sd
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.1%4th pct22nd pct +2.0 sd
Current cigarette smoking18.6%4th pct23rd pct +1.9 sd
Mutual-friend share0.9824th pct by value17th pct by value -1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4344861-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.5%3349-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work160,420 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.222%8074-0.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.6%011+2.2CDC PLACES
Any disability33.2%3141+0.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.8672·67·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.9%219+1.8CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1188472+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.3%6538-0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents060·45·-0.5
Black-white residential segregation84.6100·99·+1.7County Health Rankings
Business closing rate9.7872·75·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments224———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.8944·42·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%5344+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.8452·52·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.9%7676-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.252%79·60·+0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,370———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,370———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.7%5546+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.1%422+2.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.2%2238+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.9%8478+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people15.932·32·-0.7
Coronary heart disease6.2%1034+1.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.2%2525+0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.6%423+1.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.8%3044-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.2770·65·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression26.1%1627+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.4%2538+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.013231·46·-0.4
Drug overdose deaths uncertain38.5030+1.6County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.8113251-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7932545-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.83638·51·-0.4
Education score-0.048653·39·+0.0
Effective property tax rate0.82638·50·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,454———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.2814·16·-1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health22%2735+0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.81616+0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%3240-0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.1%2447+0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain494———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.5%1031+1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.5%2035+1.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0992423+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10928·38·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3949694-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$485,140k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.3696·29·-1.7
Hearing disability7%2944+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.6%1035+1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.1%1635+0.9CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.866%3932+0.0County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate80.2%72·83·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.5%3254+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units6,059———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,01050·50·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,27072·82·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.7%3550+0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths121420+1.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,93549·47·-0.3
Jail population rate47756·58·-0.1
Labour force6,726———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.3%3257-0.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.2%3844+0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.03851622-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.6 years833-1.5County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0289—24·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$211k———Census local government finances
Loneliness33.3%4759-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents9.4660·69·+0.0
Mammography in the past two years70.4%2424-0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.68276·76·+0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$67,2313046-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$58,48348·60·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$47,21418·31·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.9 min2421+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age43 years58·64·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$92760·64·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$159,30032·43·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$68,596—64—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$70,8367870+0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,31612·39·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0955%7676+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations5.06210-1.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.8%2742+0.5CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain30.7913+1.7County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.9824·17·-1.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.88924·20·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.59862·66·+0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.5%4349+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity43.3%08+2.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,591———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0112·14·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units4,486———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return12,640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return248·40·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move11,205———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,3182242-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$52,9633345-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$743,220k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population14,033———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,960———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,481———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over11,012———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,972———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,770———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,843———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,410———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,642———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,824———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,875———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,363———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,830———
Poverty rate13.5%2650+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.2%8277-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5391036+1.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,510———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,848———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,045———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,654———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,795———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,591———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,601———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population92.9%83·90·+1.2
Preventable hospital stays3,3121827+0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate53344·42·-0.3
Private job growth-2.516·9·-1.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,561———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02256473+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.3%12·22·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents26.68·7·-1.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.748·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200464.956·61·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200855.740·43·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201259.838·44·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201674.460·62·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202076.668·69·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.976·71·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202418.284·81·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.93%16·21·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.2%40·36·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains10.8%8·25·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.08%38·58·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year76.3%84·62·+0.9CDC PLACES
Safety score-1.13·15·-2.1
Self-care disability3.7%3148+0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20%42·53·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.5%76·74·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain3.56%58·49·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race7.81%66·62·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.7%22·24·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%93·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.1%42·37·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.5%46·58·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic87.2%50·64·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.92%60·50·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher13.7%29-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.8%1228+1.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.21724·35·-0.9
Stroke3.2%2242+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.4%90·69·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,730———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken22,662———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.9%2450+0.5CDC PLACES
Total population13,859———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed272———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4%2630+0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain7.72%8·16·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain468———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5%3349+0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,806———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,551———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,9141040+1.4County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.