placestats

Morgan County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population12,585
Density8.0people per km² of land
Median household income$126,090
Land area1578km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Morgan County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Elbert County, CO, Summit County, UT, Wasatch County, UT, San Benito County, CA, Routt County, CO, Eagle County, CO, Summit County, CO, Pitkin County, CO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Morgan Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Other religion adherents86.5100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.9 sd
Religious adherents87.5100th pct by value97th pct by value +3.2 sd
People per tax return2100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.0 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions20.9%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd
Binge drinking13.3%96th pct97th pct -2.5 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201291.1100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5419694+1.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance6.8%8095-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work126,020 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.462%1811+0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7.1%8097-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability24.9%5994-0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.7736·66·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.6%5187-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3278496+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13.3%9697-2.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain61.778·64·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents078·45·-0.4
Business closing rate12.592·95·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments304———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed38———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened39———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.870·90·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.9%20+1.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents04·6·-1.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain4.4%98100-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort534———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income534———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.7%1646-0.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease4.1%9098-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.2%5789-0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening63.3%8091+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.894·54·+1.8
Coronary heart disease4.4%9298-1.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%2556+0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking7.7%94100-1.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year72%8298+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.988·29·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression25.2%836+1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes7.5%7698-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.2980·97·+0.7
Economic connectedness1.29100100+2.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.44100100+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score2.4966·96·+0.1
Education score0.63242·81·+0.1
Effective property tax rate0.54332·19·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,922———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents0.7210·1·-1.3
Fair or poor self-rated health12.4%9299-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter75263-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.46%4867-0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity7.9%94100-1.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain276———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress16.1%6189-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.7%7496-0.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.045910099-2.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.097346·16·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3659899-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$537,930k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score1.0480·97·+0.6
Hearing disability6.2%2278+0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure26.4%7197-0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28%8696-1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.93%5179+0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate90.2%90·100·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity7.3%94100-1.2CDC PLACES
Housing units3,833———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate65456·22·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$32,53976·98·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability5.8%8898-1.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain41.910099-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,19822·19·-0.6
Jail population rate58485·69·+0.6
Labour force6,056———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation5%94100-1.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support18.7%8899-1.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02662935-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy81 years6996+0.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.5%7281-0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents0.288·2·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years71.9%2835-0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score1.83100·100·+2.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$145,7408699+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$105,86064·97·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$73,32240·88·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work26 min6438-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age32.5 years4·4·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,49360·94·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$600,90076·98·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$126,090—99—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$122,6709299+1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill3,26456·88·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0486%218-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0105-1.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability8.7%8498-0.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.98880·27·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.32928·40·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.7878·90·+0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity14.9%8899-1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity25.1%7498-1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,605———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents084·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents86.5100·100·+6.9
Owner-occupied housing units3,251———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return13,150———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return2100·100·+3.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move11,558———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$43,1942287-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$70,7723685-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$920,320k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,004———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,000———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,229———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,784———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,149———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,520———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line561———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,572———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,047———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,166———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,777———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census12,295———
Poverty rate (model-based)4.3%98100-1.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2168499-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,171———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,841———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,161———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,597———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,192———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,606———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,760———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population57.3%48·41·-0.2
Preventable hospital stays1,0548497-1.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate69.63·0·-1.3
Private job growth3.1746·70·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,314———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0152232-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain4%3·0·-1.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents87.5100·97·+3.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.796·97·+2.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200487.5100·99·+2.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200882.8100·98·+2.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201291.1100·100·+2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.796·91·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202082.794·87·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.892·77·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-0.82947·18·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions20.9%100·100·+2.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit5.4%6·2·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.2%42·86·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.08%20·24·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.7%41·13·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.2%9299-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over12.1%4·3·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain6.39%0·1·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.19%14·29·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.88%10·25·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.7%58·59·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.5%28·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married66%98·99·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.21%11·18·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.7%86·85·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.1%13·1·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher38.8%5891+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%2464+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.14438·59·-0.3
Stroke2.3%8498-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication49.9%10·1·-1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,560———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken20,296———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off4.9%9199-1.5CDC PLACES
Total population12,585———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed134———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.2%8693-0.8BLS LAUS
Vision disability3%9099-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,919———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain180———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,852———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain3,81696100-1.5County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.