placestats

Madison County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8975
Density1.0people per km² of land
Median household income$67,420
Land area9293km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Madison County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cavalier County, ND, Frontier County, NE, Teton County, MT, Ness County, KS, Kinney County, TX, Emmons County, ND, Wallowa County, OR, Armstrong County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Madison Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Private job growth-19.50th pct by value0th pct by value -5.8 sd
Mutual-friend share0.9830th pct by value18th pct by value -4.5 sd
Median home value$440,500100th pct by value95th pct by value +4.1 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$112,990100th pct95th pct +2.9 sd
Mean travel time to work27.1 min0th pct30th pct +2.7 sd
Median gross rent$1,159100th pct by value84th pct by value +2.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5385494+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.3%6464-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work85,355 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.267%3959+0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over7.8%9295-1.4CDC PLACES
Any disability26.3%8889-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.28100·90·+2.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.5%3263+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2829293+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.7%41+1.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents0100·45·—
Business closing rate10.674·86·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments310———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed32———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened49———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate16.396·98·+2.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%1411+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.0412·37·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11.7%8083-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort909———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income909———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81%3619-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.2%9289-1.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.9%7482-0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59%8063+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.820·67·-0.9
Coronary heart disease4.9%10091-1.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.8%2242+0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.7%9486-1.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.8%8081+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.4296·84·+1.8IRS county migration flows
Depression23.9%3450+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes7.3%10098-1.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.92292·89·+1.1
Economic connectedness1.16994+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.772540-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.894·90·+1.5
Effective property tax rate0.4094·7·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,841———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents7.918·15·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health15.4%8490-0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.27794-0.7County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised142—92·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate18.5—89·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.19%103-1.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.2%9495-1.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain252———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.7%3867+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%6482-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.05218999-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.09862·19·-1.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4137485-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$738,520k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.32280·73·+0.7
Hearing disability6.7%7257-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure26.8%9897-1.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.3%9698-1.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.6%76·84·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.1%9195-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units6,405———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$16,61890·90·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.9%8689-1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain89.98661-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,47340·29·-0.3
Jail population rate16520·11·-0.4
Labour force3,968———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.8%7288-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22%4770-0.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy80.3 years9094+1.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.1%5387-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.7918·26·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years71.8%4434-0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0696·93·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$112,99010095+2.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$81,22590·89·+1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$64,60776·78·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.1 min030+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age54.1 years96·98·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,159100·84·+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$440,500100·95·+4.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$67,420—61—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$73,3169076+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,80072·60·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.094%6475+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations133268-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.6%10095-1.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.9830·18·-4.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.6488·95·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.8698·91·+1.9IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity17.3%10098-1.8CDC PLACES
Obesity28.6%9495-2.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,703———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents8.1984·93·+0.2
Owner-occupied housing units2,986———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return22·8·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,918———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,4136877+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$76,6087490+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$728,470k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,509———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,521———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)8,169———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over7,820———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,033———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,063———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,742———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line603———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line856———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,903———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,407———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,721———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,425———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,623———
Poverty rate6.77%8995-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.1%9486-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2619897-1.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,656———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,933———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,568———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,530———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,778———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,087———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,461———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population57.3%40·41·-0.2
Preventable hospital stays1,3898294-0.9County Health Rankings
Private job growth-19.50·0·-5.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,396———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0264083-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain6.8%16·5·-1.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents24.94·5·-1.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200077.852·94·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.548·86·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.734·64·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201270.838·73·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201673.622·59·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202070.312·52·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.214·55·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-4.594·12·-2.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.39%98·85·+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.18%28·11·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains26.3%62·92·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.79%84·72·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.1%14·5·-1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.8%9090-1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over30.6%92·97·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.97%38·21·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.81%26·39·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.53%32·33·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86%22·27·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married19.7%26·4·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married63.9%84·97·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm83.3%—96·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.85%42·36·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.5%68·79·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.38%30·38·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher34.3%9686+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30%9697-1.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.61429·84·-0.6
Stroke2.6%9290-1.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.7%18·8·-1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,010———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,453———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.1%8492-1.0CDC PLACES
Total population8,975———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed127———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%2659+0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate42.2%96·97·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,702———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.6%9493-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,462———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,151———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,982—93—County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.