placestats

Live Oak County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,444
Density4.3people per km² of land
Median household income$53,869
Land area2693km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Live Oak County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Harrison County, MO, Aroostook County, ME, Iron County, MI, Stephens County, TX, Deaf Smith County, TX, Navajo County, AZ, Mahnomen County, MN, Logan County, CO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Live Oak Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50156100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.5 sd
Economic connectedness in high school0.969100th pct76th pct +2.5 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$82,62298th pct78th pct +2.2 sd
Share divorced8.58%2nd pct by value9th pct by value -2.1 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance25.6%6th pct2nd pct +2.0 sd
Injury deaths53.8100th pct97th pct -2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4728079+0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance25.6%62+2.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain101,910 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over25.2%47+1.6CDC PLACES
Any disability37.1%4620+0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.7980·66·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.8%8673-1.3CDC PLACES
Binge drinking17.9%3644+0.3CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain156100·100·+3.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents072·45·-0.4
Business closing rate6.3320·12·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments242———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened25———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.562·69·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6%9090-1.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents26.192·89·+1.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain23.5%4625+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.189%28·29·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,571———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,571———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%5620+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.4%6436-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.5%5624-0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening48.9%163-1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.122·52·-0.8
Coronary heart disease6.8%2414+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.7%8887-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.2%6236-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year47.9%2210-0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.2166·64·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression22%8270-0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes14.2%1210+1.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.91734·16·-0.6
Economic connectedness0.8036649+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.96910076+2.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.66586·41·+0.8
Education score0.19171·56·+0.6
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.88246·54·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,644———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents27.556·67·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health28%107+1.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.8816+1.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%3215-0.5County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population875———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.8%7245-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.8%2816+0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0375671-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11730·56·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.483816+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$2,807,000k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.3160·32·+0.3
Hearing disability7.8%3617-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure36%2626+0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.5%1829+0.9CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.965%9693+1.3County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate72.9%32·43·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing units5,971———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,92878·88·+0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-2,04236·28·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.3%3823+0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain53.810097-2.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,52883·76·+1.0
Jail population rate74889·82·+0.6
Labour force3,822———BLS LAUS
Learning rate uncertain-0.04022820-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy76.5 years9264+1.2County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents4.0332·29·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years67.4%249-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.3932·22·-0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$82,6229878+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$60,54184·64·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$62,58396·75·+1.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29.8 min617+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age38.6 years20·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$94994·67·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$142,30074·33·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,869—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,2028439+1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,25552·37·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.106%6684+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.883425-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.9%2214+0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99314·45·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.2286·90·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.57768·65·+0.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity33.7%1611+0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity40.1%4829+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,210———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.8140·28·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,071———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,530———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return242·64·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,966———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$27,7573419-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$48,8793829-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$578,140k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,828———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,584———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,450———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,407———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,323———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,313———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,702———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,686———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,895———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,918———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,672———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,152———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,335———
Poverty rate17.2%3429+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)17%4627+0.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5026445-0.5County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,004———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,201———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,176———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,113———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,302———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,054———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,093———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population58.8%31·43·-0.2
Preventable hospital stays1,4918692-0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,18983·88·+0.8
Private job growth7.0590·93·+0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,780———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01121011-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents58.574·73·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200071.786·86·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200475.286·87·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200874.792·89·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201277.494·88·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.486·86·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202083.788·89·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202485.288·90·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.446·66·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.86%76·43·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit19.4%60·70·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains14.9%60·48·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.84%56·52·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.4%28·17·-0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.2%2011+1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.2%40·56·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%24·24·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain2.08%45·35·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.58%2·9·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born7.65%80·77·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race42.1%88·93·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.5%16·17·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married31%70·66·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.3%58·50·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic6.41%88·94·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain3.05%79·91·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic48.5%18·13·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.12%44·75·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher13.8%810-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.6%2421+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.23732·34·-0.4
Stroke3.7%2217+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.7%62·57·+0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,890———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,358———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population11,444———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed178———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.7%1815+0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate29.5%74·89·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,761———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.8%188+1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,234———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain348———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,415———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,5148256-0.7County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.