placestats

LaMoure County, ND

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4107
Density1.4people per km² of land
Median household income$70,263
Land area2968km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like LaMoure County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Dawson County, MT, Kittson County, MN, Koochiching County, MN, Cook County, MN, Sanborn County, SD, Hemphill County, TX, Lipscomb County, TX, Stanton County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where LaMoure Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people73.3100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.5 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$96,58098th pct91st pct +2.4 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.638100th pct100th pct +2.3 sd
Economy score1.83100th pct by value90th pct by value +2.1 sd
Economic connectedness1.24100th pct100th pct +1.7 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.48%96th pct74th pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.638100100+2.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain7.9%8284-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work34,325 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%7394-1.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16%1845+0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability26.9%8086-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.2418·4·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.4%2664+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2769592+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.1%82+1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain64.5—70·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents0100·45·—
Business closing rate11.184·89·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments134———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.8654·41·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%4632+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents17.958·77·+0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain9.5%9691-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.143%29·9·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort651———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income651———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.2%4222-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.8%5075-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.5%8286-1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59.5%7867+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people73.3100·99·+3.5
Coronary heart disease5.6%3463+0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%3469+0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15%4864-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.7%8088+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.820·6·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression21.1%7481-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.8%6888-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.7266·80·+0.6
Economic connectedness1.24100100+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school15980+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.83100·90·+2.1
Education score0.14155·52·-0.0
Effective property tax rate0.96843·60·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,109———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents22.670·58·+0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health16.4%6082-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.84586-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.48%9674+1.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.2%7390-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.3%9095-1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.6%7688-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.03669298-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12984·77·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4563039+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$428,560k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.728100·91·+1.6
Hearing disability7.2%2434+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29%6486-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.9%4478-0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate84.9%94·97·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.5%7092-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units2,074———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$10,46076·80·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%6482-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain93.65955-0.4County Health Rankings
Labour force2,148———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.6%8091-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.8%5073-0.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy82.5 years9898+1.6County Health Rankings
Loneliness29.3%9797-1.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2678·95·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years74.4%6058+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.79864·82·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$96,5809891+2.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$61,83966·68·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,37934·46·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.1 min5084-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.7 years72·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6078·6·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$118,00016·20·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$70,263—68—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,7976468+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,1428·31·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0728%4049-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations227296+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.6%7286-0.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99644·66·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.2124·10·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.5640·20·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.1%6876-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity35.2%7074-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,712———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0238·17·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,454———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,690———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·66·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,395———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$41,7928084+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$92,9229696+1.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$378,000k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,068———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,096———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,324———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,206———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,896———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,106———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain430———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain378———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,980———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,021———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,749———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher701———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,093———
Poverty rate uncertain10.8%2971+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain9.4%8884-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain2899294-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,468———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,335———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,241———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,194———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,151———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,219———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,123———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,1715373-0.2County Health Rankings
Private job growth1.4758·46·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,032———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03787896+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain7.1%17·6·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents66.560·85·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.834·82·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200469.132·74·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200860.128·55·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20126530·58·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201674.732·63·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202075.732·67·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.134·69·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20248.3260·46·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.12%34·25·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit6.88%4·4·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains30.2%96·97·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.06%50·23·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.1%46·22·+0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%5677-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.9%80·92·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.69%26·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain2%13·11·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.3%74·86·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married18.3%4·2·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married64.7%92·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.66%3·7·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.7%96·98·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.3%81·78·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher24.2%5061+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.6%8091-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.4474·98·+0.7
Stroke2.8%5076-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.9%60·43·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,890———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,261———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.1%9092-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population4,107———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.02145215-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed39———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.8%9098-1.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate17.5%36·61·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units362———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%6083-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50667———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain43———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,794———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.