placestats

Lac qui Parle County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6694
Density3.4people per km² of land
Median household income$71,639
Land area1981km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lac qui Parle County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bailey County, TX, Wabaunsee County, KS, Archer County, TX, Boone County, NE, Ringgold County, IA, Walsh County, ND, Uintah County, UT, Roseau County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lac qui Parle Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents57100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.5 sd
Religious adherents97.4100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.2 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.18%4th pct3rd pct -2.0 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200046.42nd pct by value14th pct by value -1.9 sd
Arthritis20%100th pct97th pct -1.9 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.667%3rd pct2nd pct +1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5144690-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.9%8884-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work48,050 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.667%32+1.8County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.6%7883-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability26.9%8286-0.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.2836·16·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20%10097-1.9CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2298788+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.5%3010+0.7CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain57.119·53·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.2
Business closing rate6.7826·16·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments176———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.6510·6·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3432+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents20.872·82·+0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.4%7888-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.153%48·13·-0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort920———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income920———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%7643+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%10090-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.8%7283-0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.9%9285+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people40.282·88·+1.0
Coronary heart disease5.2%8682-1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%6878-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.2%4861+0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.2%8283+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.3820·14·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression24.9%2840+0.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.7%8889-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.91190·89·+1.0
Economic connectedness1.29699+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9195669+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.3666·77·+0.5
Education score0.36458·67·+0.1
Effective property tax rate0.94838·59·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,556———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.672·50·+0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health15.6%8089-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.87786-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.18%43-2.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.1%8491-0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population130———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress16.7%6283-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.1%9893-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02279296-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14296·90·+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4383659+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$444,720k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.16538·64·-0.3
Hearing disability6.3%9674-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure27.3%9495-1.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.8%6289-0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate83%88·93·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.5%8192-0.8CDC PLACES
Housing units3,474———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3176·3·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-34544·37·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7%8687-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain90.44960+0.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate87819·10·-0.8
Jail population rate1067·4·-0.9
Labour force3,649———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.1%5482-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.3%6581-0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0226941-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy79.4 years8090+0.9County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.6%6090-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents57100·100·+2.5
Mammography in the past two years79.7%9495+1.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.90984·88·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$81,1746876+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$53,29250·45·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$53,63750·54·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work17.3 min8290-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.7 years94·88·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$80968·42·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$143,40024·34·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$71,639—71—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$67,9473664-0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,36020·42·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.044%413-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations20.97495+0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.1%9691-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99788·83·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.1330·18·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.10460·36·+0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23%7477-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity34.8%8277-0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,881———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents026·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,390———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,250———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return244·50·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,753———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$40,2828680+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$68,1835882+0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$455,730k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,684———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,630———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,500———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,192———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,842———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,820———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line520———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line615———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,535———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,474———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,151———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,070———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,719———
Poverty rate7.96%7890-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.5%7684-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4073469+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,453———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,541———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,192———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,984———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,860———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,040———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,996———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population75%81·65·+0.9
Preventable hospital stays2,6052856+0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate21123·7·-0.8
Private job growth2.1958·58·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,448———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03128691+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.9%27·12·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents97.4100·99·+2.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200046.42·14·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200446.74·13·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2008478·21·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201249.58·22·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201663.710·36·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202063.612·38·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202466.412·39·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242096·85·+1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.74%46·40·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11%36·20·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.8%64·87·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.66%84·82·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.1%48·22·-0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.9%8087-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.2%94·93·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.433%—22·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.64%40·17·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born1.94%31·24·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.14%26·28·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.9%90·90·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%40·17·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.1%56·89·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.21%18·18·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.4%86·89·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.75%71·68·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.1%4652-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.7%8295-1.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.1578·96·+0.7
Stroke2.7%7884-1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.2%28·21·-0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,280———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken11,620———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.9%9594-1.2CDC PLACES
Total population6,694———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed93———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%5486-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate17.1%67·59·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units593———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%9091-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,155———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain66———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,779———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain6,9647185-0.5County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.