placestats

Keokuk County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9964
Density6.6people per km² of land
Median household income$60,856
Land area1500km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Keokuk County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Arkansas County, AR, Bland County, VA, Nemaha County, NE, Maries County, MO, Hamilton County, IL, Perry County, AR, Jackson County, TX, Sumner County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Keokuk Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mobility score1.42100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.5 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents25.596th pct by value95th pct by value +2.0 sd
Incarceration of children raised poor here0.0064995th pct99th pct -1.8 sd
Binge drinking22.3%8th pct6th pct +1.7 sd
Colorectal cancer screening60.9%90th pct78th pct +1.6 sd
Dental visit in the past year64.9%92nd pct81st pct +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5039087+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.8%9685-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work108,040 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.9%5046-0.0CDC PLACES
Any disability29.2%8869-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.9912·12·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.3%4351+0.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.3%86+1.7CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain6768·74·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents064·45·-0.4
Business closing rate8.1828·42·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments198———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.782·72·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%619+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1370·66·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.9%8265-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.133%9·7·-1.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,585———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,585———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.7%2216-0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7%4543-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.7%7458-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.9%9078+1.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people29.966·72·+0.1
Coronary heart disease5.9%5747-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%5965-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.2%2226+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.9%9281+1.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.9418·28·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression22.7%6162-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.4%5955-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.34782·61·+0.9
Economic connectedness0.9678879+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.743735-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.84264·52·+0.4
Effective property tax rate1.3378·81·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,085———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.1112·11·-1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health18.7%7161-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.13437+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%6640+0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14%6964-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain83———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.8%5345+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.2%7459-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02366879-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1244·62·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4366262-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$442,950k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.1386·61·+1.0
Hearing disability7.1%5539-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.8%5149-0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.2%7675-0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.9%70·76·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11%7873-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units4,650———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.006499599-1.8Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate49210·12·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$49334·41·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.3%7859-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain91.36259-0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,02616·14·-0.3
Jail population rate18119·13·-0.6
Labour force5,258———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%6967-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.8%3337+0.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.7 years8467+0.9County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0444—26·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$252k———Census local government finances
Loneliness34.4%2543+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents25.596·95·+2.0
Mammography in the past two years75%8664+0.9CDC PLACES
Material security score0.57284·69·+0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$66,8355145-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,90512·21·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,41226·25·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work26.6 min3633+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.8 years48·62·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$82261·44·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$112,20014·16·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,856—43—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$65,6568458+1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,49150·49·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.102%7881+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.16675+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.2%7663-1.0CDC PLACES
Mobility score1.42100·99·+2.5
Mutual-friend share0.99442·55·+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.5686·77·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.94714·12·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.7%6948-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity41.5%817+1.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,065———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0126·14·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units3,206———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return262·73·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,814———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,1816047+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$56,6116858+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$563,110k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,947———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,914———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,137———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,694———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,975———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,183———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,175———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,090———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,815———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,820———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,836———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,108———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,033———
Poverty rate12%7862-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.1%8670-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4507257-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,947———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,480———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,361———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,266———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,985———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,303———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,182———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population36.4%19·16·-1.0
Preventable hospital stays1,9488681-0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate31212·17·-1.0
Private job growth2.8866·67·-0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,714———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01833854-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12.7%47·50·-0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents44.642·43·-0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200054.118·34·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200457.620·38·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200851.920·33·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201255.220·33·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201671.634·54·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202072.936·59·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202471.328·50·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202417.250·78·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.29%40·30·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.8%18·33·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.5%76·72·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.2%80·77·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.3%55·38·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%7157-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.9%56·70·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%5·14·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.5%32·44·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain0.833%0·3·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.22%23·15·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.7%58·58·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.8%48·33·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.5%64·71·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic1.76%12·9·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.35%22·31·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.1%96·96·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.28%44·57·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.9%1219-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.2%8482-1.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.23758·65·+0.1
Stroke3.1%6350-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.7%78·57·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,370———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,736———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.8%6965-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population9,964———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed173———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%5055-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate12.6%20·39·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units585———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%8268-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,865———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain125———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,057———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,3498270-0.9County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.