placestats

Emmet County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9316
Density9.1people per km² of land
Median household income$65,181
Land area1025km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Emmet County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Dawson County, NE, Crawford County, IA, Hutchinson County, TX, Llano County, TX, Hancock County, IL, Franklin County, ID, Allamakee County, IA, Mendocino County, CA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Emmet Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share now married43.7%2nd pct by value12th pct by value -2.3 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents3898th pct by value99th pct by value +1.9 sd
Business closing rate6.194th pct by value10th pct by value -1.7 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population22.2%6th pct by value8th pct by value -1.7 sd
Colorectal cancer screening61.9%96th pct85th pct +1.6 sd
Share never married34.2%96th pct by value79th pct by value +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5158290+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.5%6461-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work99,640 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.5%3449+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability28.3%8275-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.8622·27·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.5%4663-0.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.1752131-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.6%104+1.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents064·45·-0.5
Business closing rate6.194·10·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments258———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.88·6·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3232+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents13.762·68·+0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.8%6666-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.196%46·33·-0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,393———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,393———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%2820-0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.6%5254-0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.3%6464-0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.9%9685+1.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people23.446·56·-0.1
Coronary heart disease5.8%5052-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.1%6873-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17%3839+0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.1%9486+1.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.0744·31·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression21%8482-0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10%5864-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.45980·66·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.9177072+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9699076+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.80440·49·-0.3
Education score-0.438·20·-1.5
Effective property tax rate1.4882·87·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,250———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.6116·12·-1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health18.6%6262-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.76870-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.51%8884+1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.2%4762-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain392———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.1%6659-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13%6463-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0644650+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12462·69·+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4179081-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$456,990k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.38286·76·+0.9
Hearing disability6.9%4648-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.1%3856+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.4%5473-0.3CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.862%1730-0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate77.7%62·70·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.5%5667-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units4,517———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate54021·15·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-5,3304·16·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.9%8068-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain99.93845+0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,55326·32·-0.7
Jail population rate15210·9·-0.4
Labour force4,403———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.9%5665-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.6%3340+0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77 years5870+0.3County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.152—46·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$764k———Census local government finances
Loneliness33.5%2856+0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3898·99·+1.9
Mammography in the past two years79.7%9895+1.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.71690·78·+1.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$67,0563346-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,9624·13·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$48,29222·35·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.6 min5669-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.3 years64·66·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$73118·23·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$106,2004·12·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$65,181—56—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,5003246-0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,57032·52·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.073%4650-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.58291+1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.9%7868-0.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99784·81·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.38742·26·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.20928·31·-0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.2%6052-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity43.2%49+1.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,922———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0112·14·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,049———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,050———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return220·27·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,178———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,9577467+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$52,2863643-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$485,060k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,277———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,229———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,866———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,456———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,593———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,192———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain904———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line867———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,708———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,847———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,384———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,032———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,388———
Poverty rate uncertain10.4%9274-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.8%9681-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3996071-0.5County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,630———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,156———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,015———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,687———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,753———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,853———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,831———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population22.2%6·8·-1.7
Preventable hospital stays2,2126071-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate38831·25·-0.5
Private job growth-2.9910·8·-1.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,565———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02365676+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.8%47·43·-0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.372·73·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200051.820·27·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200452.918·25·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20084822·24·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.426·32·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201669.740·49·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202068.330·47·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202472.246·53·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202420.490·86·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.05%18·24·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.8%34·33·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.4%42·61·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.79%88·90·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.7%68·42·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%7062-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.5%78·80·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.95%52·34·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.8%78·79·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain4.21%52·56·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race9.85%56·68·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90%86·73·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share never married34.2%96·79·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married43.7%2·12·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain75.9%—93·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic85.6%60·60·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.26%86·78·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.7%818-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.2%6076-0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.58780·83·+0.8
Stroke3%6258-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.1%50·46·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,380———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,876———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.6%5068-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population9,316———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02411213-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed153———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.5%5246+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate13.2%32·42·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units595———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%7064-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,759———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,623———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,7056877-0.6County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.