placestats

Ellis County, OK

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3717
Density1.2people per km² of land
Median household income$56,992
Land area3190km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Ellis County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Nye County, NV, Big Horn County, MT, Donley County, TX, Barber County, KS, Cheyenne County, KS, Clearwater County, ID, Boyd County, NE, Harper County, OK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Ellis Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations41100th pct100th pct +2.9 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.410th pct by value0th pct by value -2.2 sd
High cholesterol34.3%0th pct16th pct +2.2 sd
Social connection score2.1198th pct by value100th pct by value +2.1 sd
High blood pressure35.8%2nd pct28th pct +2.1 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over24%4th pct10th pct +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5528695+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.3%4041-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work35,765 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%276+0.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over24%410+2.0CDC PLACES
Any disability36.9%821+1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.1129·13·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.3%1638+0.8CDC PLACES
Binge drinking15.8%9877-1.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.4
Business closing rate5.8514·8·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments104———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.7846·40·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%4444+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents624·41·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.7%4845-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.119%0·4·-1.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort593———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income593———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.8%9648+1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.3%2237+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.7%2232+0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.9%4015-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people58.792·97·+1.2
Coronary heart disease6.2%3234+0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.2%2225+0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.3%2235+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year56.9%2840-0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.5390·86·+1.3IRS county migration flows
Depression26.2%1226+1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%3452+0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.3624·32·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.9115071+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.80458·49·+0.2
Effective property tax rate0.74833·43·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,800———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents4994·92·+1.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%4451-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.92465+0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.44%9860+1.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.7%2643+0.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain168———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.8%3445+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.7%5649-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02669097-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11238·46·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4326866-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$967,070k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.074356·47·+0.3
Hearing disability8.3%169+0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.8%228+2.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.3%016+2.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate82.3%90·91·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.1%2947+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units2,125———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,07852·55·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$3,43649·55·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.1%3642+0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1314312+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,94371·69·+0.0
Jail population rate71981·81·+0.0
Labour force1,847———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.7%3450-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.7%1739+1.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy72.9 years1026-0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.4%2358+0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents22.378·93·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years67.2%248-0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.25557·50·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,5537351+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$48,98243·31·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,54542·25·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.9 min1652+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years32·67·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72848·22·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$122,50052·23·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$56,992—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,2125233-0.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill9166·22·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.161%9097+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations41100100+2.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.7%2033+0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99762·73·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.9364·82·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.410·0·-2.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.7%1623+1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity40.1%1229+1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,447———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents032·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,191———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,100———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·79·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,724———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,3543237-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$64,2446276+0.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$233,660k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,637———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,648———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,053———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,849———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,598———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over869———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain504———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line503———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,641———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,593———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,134———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher519———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,749———
Poverty rate uncertain13.8%5048-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14%4646-0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality663814+0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,013———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,080———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,909———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,801———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,827———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,873———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,812———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.5
Preventable hospital stays1,0019298-1.2County Health Rankings
Prison population rate35918·21·-0.7
Private job growth-2.0816·10·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs706———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0243678-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.7%77·56·+0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents77.386·94·+0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200076.476·92·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20048192·95·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200885.298·99·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201287.598·98·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201691.2100·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202091.2100·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.994·97·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.684·63·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.23%78·51·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.8%58·47·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains23.9%64·87·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%52·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.7%94·55·+1.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%5648-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.4%32·79·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain1.91%—79·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0.915%—51·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.71%8·10·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain4.52%55·58·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.88%56·66·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.3%16·16·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.7%64·33·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.3%50·70·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.04%63·72·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic83.9%44·56·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.3%84·96·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20%3141-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.4%2059+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score2.1198·100·+2.1
Stroke3.2%3842-0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.3%62·50·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,550———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,713———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.5%2941+0.3CDC PLACES
Total population3,717———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.048310099+1.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed47———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6886-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate31.9%80·91·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units678———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.3%3441-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50763———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,494———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain14,0871214+0.2County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.