placestats

Custer County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,938
Density1.2people per km² of land
Median household income$63,585
Land area9799km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Custer County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Powell County, MT, Roger Mills County, OK, Griggs County, ND, Garfield County, WA, Washakie County, WY, Shackelford County, TX, Beaver County, OK, Gove County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Custer Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Homeownership rate68.5%4th pct by value24th pct by value -2.0 sd
Median property tax bill2,24296th pct by value72nd pct by value +1.8 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people17.70th pct by value38th pct by value -1.8 sd
High cholesterol27.1%98th pct99th pct -1.7 sd
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.91%90th pct by value85th pct by value +1.4 sd
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher29.8%92nd pct77th pct +1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4933685-0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.5%7261-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work79,035 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.4%9290-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability30%6262-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.8469·49·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.9%843+1.3CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.06754450-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.9%103+1.3CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain62.6—66·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate5.8424·8·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments404———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed23———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened43———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.978·74·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%611+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents16.568·75·+0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.4%7473-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.145%16·10·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,487———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,487———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.7%268-0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%6265-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.2%6666-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57%7845+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people17.70·38·-1.8
Coronary heart disease5.3%8678-1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.2%2025+1.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.8%6867-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.2%6468+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.7658·52·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression25.2%1836+1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.5%8891-1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.44972·66·+0.5
Economic connectedness0.9444676-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.058485+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.79824·49·-0.6
Education score-0.20639·30·-0.2
Effective property tax rate1.164·70·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,498———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents16.844·44·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health17.3%7473-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.84786-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%7040+0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.3%7481-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain188———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.4%2653+0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%5461-0.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03793170+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12570·71·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4464850-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$624,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.19568·65·+0.5
Hearing disability7.3%4231-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.9%8686-0.9CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.1%9899-1.7CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%—40—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate68.5%4·24·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10%7786-0.8CDC PLACES
Housing units5,770———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-8,55120·9·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%6266-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths99.67345-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,22931·21·-0.6
Jail population rate17313·12·-1.0
Labour force6,667———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%5267-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.7%4874-0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.2 years4261-0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.6%3680+0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.614·25·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years75.4%8667+1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.55260·68·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,3364250-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$51,52241·39·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$60,07470·71·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work13.6 min9298-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.6 years40·61·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$91889·63·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$204,20072·63·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$63,585—51—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$58,8503038-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,24296·72·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.046%1215-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.481622-0.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.9%8282-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99652·71·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate5.0884·94·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.089661·45·+0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity22.2%8083-0.9CDC PLACES
Obesity32.7%8886-1.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,044———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents2.7960·68·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units3,455———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,080———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return218·28·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,931———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,8644861-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$54,8082052-0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$658,410k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,013———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,985———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,979———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,637———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,602———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,434———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,344———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,571———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,514———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,551———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,068———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,563———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,867———
Poverty rate11.7%3964-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.6%2649+0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4414060+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,905———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,048———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,482———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,365———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,185———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,860———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,797———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population76.9%62·69·+0.3
Preventable hospital stays2,3076168-0.3County Health Rankings
Private job growth-0.36827·22·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,327———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0243278-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.7%42·17·-0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents39.718·32·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200067.822·78·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200466.926·68·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200857.318·48·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201264.824·57·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201675.736·66·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202073.526·61·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202475.226·61·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.4754·42·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.56%50·36·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.2%60·35·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.4%46·80·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.11%86·76·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year69%26·7·-0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.2%7672-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.4%26·57·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.7%70·78·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.57%8·17·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.31%14·30·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago84.3%12·16·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.9%72·34·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.6%30·58·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.91%90·85·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.53%—41·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.5%64·71·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.8%29·48·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher29.8%9277+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33%6683-0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.18417·62·-0.9
Stroke2.9%5867-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.6%34·12·-1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,470———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,952———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.3%5874-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population11,938———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02033016-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed169———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6086-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate12.6%8·39·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units726———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.3%7472-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,475———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain155———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,819———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,3636257-0.4County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.