placestats

Chicot County, AR

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9997
Density6.1people per km² of land
Median household income$39,683
Land area1650km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chicot County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bradley County, AR, Glades County, FL, Noxubee County, MS, Monroe County, AL, Cumberland County, KY, Fulton County, AR, Latimer County, OK, Newton County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chicot Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Sleeping less than 7 hours47.6%6th pct0th pct +1.6 sd
Black-white residential segregation57.794th pct by value68th pct by value +1.5 sd
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over32.9%10th pct1st pct +1.4 sd
Mean travel time to work20.5 min90th pct76th pct -1.4 sd
Per capita personal income$50,15188th pct34th pct +1.4 sd
Share divorced16.4%86th pct by value96th pct by value +1.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.346207-0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance15.3%3916-0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work65,300 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over32.9%101+1.4CDC PLACES
Any disability42.3%413+0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0346·31·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27%8017-0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.658212-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13.5%6596-0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents8.660·94·+0.2
Black-white residential segregation57.794·68·+1.5County Health Rankings
Business closing rate8.9158·59·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments177———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.1316·8·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.7%6594-0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.1290·28·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain37.2%323+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.41%47·93·-0.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort3,020———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income3,020———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%5431+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.1%709-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.7%524+0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.7%2010-0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.250·84·-0.0
Coronary heart disease7.4%615-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%6130-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.5%7411-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year41.5%304+0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.0376·80·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression22.7%5462-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes16.1%413+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.7341·4·+0.1
Economic connectedness0.562408-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.12572·7·+0.8
Education score-1.2417·4·-0.9
Effective property tax rate0.54646·20·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,056———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents39.178·83·+0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health31.5%282+0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.61921+0.8County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain33.7545-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.39%8440+0.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity32.2%373+0.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain236———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.7%6113-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17%636-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04235568-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.16976·98·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.511106+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$364,570k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.0448·5·-0.1
Hearing disability7.4%7628-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure46.1%301+0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34%7421-0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate67.4%28·21·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Homicide rate uncertain25—4—County Health Rankings
Housing insecurity25%302+0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units5,114———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.03243323+0.6Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,07484·70·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.9%464-0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1194221-0.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,45445·60·-0.4
Jail population rate1745·12·-0.5
Labour force3,212———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation16.1%373+0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support34.1%231+1.0CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.02686535-0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy69.8 years246-0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness38.3%499+0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.5228·24·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years73.4%8449+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.9928·2·-0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$55,3419013+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$48,87886·30·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,80556·13·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.5 min9076-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.9 years58·63·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$66138·11·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$90,50050·5·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$39,683—5—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$40,381262-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill49435·5·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0244%222-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.15027-0.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability20.4%373+0.2CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.92525·13·-0.8
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain259124-1.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99846·89·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.7926·8·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-216·3·-1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity39.8%262+0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity47.4%221+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,919———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents1.2864·38·-0.1
Owner-occupied housing units2,641———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·65·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,990———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,003688+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$50,1518834+1.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$476,790k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,507———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,538———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,147———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,511———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,977———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,166———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,264———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,621———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,286———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,825———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,244———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,202———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,208———
Poverty rate24.4%608-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)29.7%242+0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality799144+1.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,452———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,757———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,208———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,361———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,176———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,103———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,490———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population81.8%68·77·+0.7
Preventable hospital stays4,371277+0.4County Health Rankings
Private job growth-4.9412·4·-0.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,923———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01535434+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps23.9%35·93·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents55.772·68·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200035.716·3·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200436.616·4·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20084128·12·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201238.724·8·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201642.226·9·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202043.722·11·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20244824·13·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.338·62·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.76%84·60·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit33.5%64·97·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.25%78·15·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.02%58·57·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year78.8%61·90·+0.3CDC PLACES
Safety score-1.4883·9·+0.6
Self-care disability6.4%463+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.7%68·68·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic53.4%60·97·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced16.4%86·96·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.36%—32·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.28%76·54·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.5%84·93·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married29.4%42·58·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married43.3%42·12·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain2.42%19·78·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic38.4%28·8·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.9%84·97·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher17.2%8625+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours47.6%60+1.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.2228·2·-0.6
Stroke4.8%302+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication64.3%61·96·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,460———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,385———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off19.2%262+0.6CDC PLACES
Total population9,997———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02143615-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed156———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.9%4012-0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate23.4%36·79·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,195———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.9%354+0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,695———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,187———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost16,985175+0.8County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.