placestats

Carlisle County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4763
Density9.7people per km² of land
Median household income$62,019
Land area491km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Carlisle County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Pacific County, WA, Mason County, IL, Iroquois County, IL, Missaukee County, MI, Cass County, IA, Doddridge County, WV, Moore County, TX, Grant County, WV. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Carlisle Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Evangelical Protestant adherents54.496th pct by value95th pct by value +2.4 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.4942nd pct11th pct +2.4 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.920th pct by value3rd pct by value -2.2 sd
Premature mortality7124th pct9th pct +2.2 sd
Mean income of departing households$37,1570th pct by value4th pct by value -2.1 sd
Prison population rate1,48396th pct by value95th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4011636-1.1Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work49,600 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over18.2%2032+0.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.1312·13·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Average test score uncertain-0.09214945-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents1.5782·71·+0.3
Business closing rate8.9756·60·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments79———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed7———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.590·81·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents3.428·30·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.5%3646+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.236%78·54·+0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort567———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income567———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening60.6%8676+1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.286·81·+1.3
Dental visit in the past year52.3%1822-0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0572·60·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Economic connectedness0.9538677+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.76754·47·+0.1
Education score0.24245·59·-0.1
Effective property tax rate0.84738·52·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,942———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents54.496·95·+2.4
Fine particulate matter8.32531+0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.49%9078+1.2County Health Rankings
Friending bias0.05245659-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13180·80·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.494211+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$268,780k———BEA Regional Accounts
Homeownership rate81.4%82·88·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,315———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$12,59388·85·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths uncertain1143027+0.6County Health Rankings
Labour force2,032———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy70.9 years411-1.8County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0205—22·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$54k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents6.1330·48·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years69.6%1619-1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.14610·30·-1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,4971829-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,75026·33·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,1570·4·-2.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work26.2 min3236+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.6 years54·68·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$79240·37·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$104,7004·11·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$62,019—47—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$58,6392637-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill88710·21·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0667%2241-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.75266+0.1County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99440·51·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.5686·77·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.920·3·-2.2IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units1,876———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents010·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units1,527———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,160———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return284·83·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,749———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,8605851+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$62,3518273+0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$295,670k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,742———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,704———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,826———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,595———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,311———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over947———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain783———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line600———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,697———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,651———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,975———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher484———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,826———
Poverty rate uncertain16.7%631+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain12.9%6055-0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality71249+2.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,593———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,845———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,617———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,619———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,601———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,638———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,610———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,1288075-0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,48396·95·+2.1
Private job growth-1.518·13·-0.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs788———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01692444-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents65.588·84·+1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20005540·37·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200461.152·49·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200865.974·70·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127172·73·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.990·87·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202082.388·86·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.286·87·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202429.294·96·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.88%82·62·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit19.4%82·70·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains14.1%40·43·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.94%34·54·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Share aged 65 and over19.9%22·51·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.41%38·26·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14%82·81·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.79%37·23·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago83.5%6·12·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.1%18·15·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.7%66·66·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.07%77·72·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91%58·77·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.18%72·76·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher14.6%1213-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.9%1219+1.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.13846·59·-0.1
Tax returns filed2,060———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,554———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population4,763———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01276170+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed90———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.4%1820+0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate19%50·67·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units439———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 50971———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,895———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,9481221+1.3County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.