placestats

Carbon County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population10,877
Density2.0people per km² of land
Median household income$71,017
Land area5304km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Carbon County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Harlan County, NE, Marshall County, MN, Lincoln County, WA, Richland County, MT, Marshall County, SD, Morrow County, OR, Columbia County, WA, Dallam County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Carbon Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median home value$379,30096th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.2 sd
Religious adherents230th pct by value3rd pct by value -2.1 sd
Business opening rate13.996th pct by value94th pct by value +1.7 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.045896th pct98th pct +1.7 sd
Mean travel time to work28.9 min8th pct21st pct +1.6 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.3492nd pct by value84th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5235091+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.2%6065-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work134,600 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.421%4415+0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.5%4469-0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability28.1%6477-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.3492·84·+1.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.6%1246+1.2CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.06654663+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.4%61+1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain419·12·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate10.780·87·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments381———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed40———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened52———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate13.996·94·+1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%66+1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.1816·38·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.4%6679-0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.224%76·48·+0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,164———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,164———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.4%2013-0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.8%5475-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.6%5873-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.6%4033-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people24.820·59·-0.8
Coronary heart disease5.2%7682-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%1830+0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.8%6678-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.8%6881+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.9278·78·+0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression25.2%2036+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.2%9295-1.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.67366·78·+0.6
Economic connectedness1.077492+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.81547-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4570·81·+0.7
Education score-0.30315·25·-0.8
Effective property tax rate0.54816·20·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,575———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents7.1320·13·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%5479-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.75788-0.3County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain29.4—9—County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised148—95·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate25.8—97·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.45%9063+1.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.1%8291-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18%2261+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.7%4068-0.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.00936087-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.09898·19·-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4631632+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$487,820k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.59492·86·+1.3
Hearing disability7.1%4639-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%2270+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.5%9298-1.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.1%30·49·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.4%8293-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units6,431———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$15,09384·89·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.4%6079-0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1142326+0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,04423·15·-0.8
Jail population rate45869·56·+0.1
Labour force5,727———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.3%5278-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.3%3367-0.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy80.4 years9294+1.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.2%2173+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents5.8524·46·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years73.2%5047+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.751·77·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$78,9936073+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$78,73190·87·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$63,63784·77·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.9 min821+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age50.5 years94·94·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$88265·57·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$379,30096·92·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$71,017—70—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$72,4638474+0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,08076·68·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.113%8086+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.34076-0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.4%8888-0.9CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99324·45·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.284·84·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.4290·85·+1.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity19.9%9292-1.2CDC PLACES
Obesity32.6%8686-0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,716———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents4.8874·85·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units3,493———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,450———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return210·20·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,792———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$42,7349086+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$69,2515684+0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$791,260k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,426———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,419———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)10,122———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over9,365———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,474———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,369———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,960———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line909———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,197———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,674———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,292———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago9,753———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,534———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,473———
Poverty rate8.52%7386-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.6%6074-0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3168290-0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,789———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,321———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,750———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,846———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,991———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,052———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20247,297———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population75.1%77·66·+0.8
Preventable hospital stays1,3438694-1.1County Health Rankings
Private job growth0.041634·26·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,406———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04589698+1.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.8%27·11·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents230·3·-2.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200067.740·78·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200464.436·60·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20085632·43·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201262.234·50·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201667.226·43·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202064.920·40·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202466.720·40·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-0.98910·18·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions5.54%90·80·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.4%28·16·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains28.2%88·95·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.6%72·69·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.7%10·6·-1.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%7082-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.2%86·93·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13%88·69·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.86%22·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.7%52·70·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.6%16·8·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59%62·88·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm85%—97·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.26%47·50·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.6%66·79·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.31%35·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher30.3%8478+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.1%4483-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.82150·91·+0.2
Stroke2.8%5676-0.5CDC PLACES
Suicide rate uncertain43—1—County Health Rankings
Taking blood pressure medication51.6%22·8·-1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,780———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,443———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%5884-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population10,877———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02343313-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed152———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%5279-0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate26.7%80·85·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,715———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.9%7885-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,925———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,655———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,2387882-0.4County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.