placestats

Blanco County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population12,008
Density6.5people per km² of land
Median household income$87,564
Land area1837km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Blanco County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Williams County, ND, Garfield County, CO, Calhoun County, IL, Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK, Butler County, NE, Lake County, CO, Hamlin County, SD, Grundy County, IA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Blanco Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net migration per 100 people staying5.23100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.8 sd
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.060298th pct99th pct +4.2 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying12.8100th pct by value98th pct by value +3.1 sd
Median property tax bill4,134100th pct by value94th pct by value +2.9 sd
Income gap between arrivals and departures$41,75496th pct by value99th pct by value +2.2 sd
Mean income of arriving households$120,91096th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.416647-1.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.4%1225+0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work131,050 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.179%9186-1.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.1%3472+0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability27.1%4285-0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying12.8100·98·+3.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.1%8091-0.9CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.06193162-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.1%6219-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents074·45·-0.4
Business closing rate9.462·69·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments381———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed35———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened52———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate1492·94·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%8060-0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents17.166·76·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.4%1873+0.8Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,055———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,055———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.2%9485+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.1%7490-0.7CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.7%4485-0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.4%1831-0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people20.252·47·-0.1
Coronary heart disease4.9%7691-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.6%8089-0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking11.7%8891-1.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.4%1247-1.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.6176·86·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression23.3%1256+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.2%2681+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.92448·89·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.9774081-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9714776-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score2.2592·95·+1.2
Education score0.84378·90·+0.9
Effective property tax rate1.0450·66·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,123———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.270·39·+0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%2479+0.2CDC PLACES
Firearm share of suicides, standardised11932·62·+0.1CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate16.460·82·+0.4CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.44%5660+0.2County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population uncertain609———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17%3679+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.6%4288-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06533049+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.099520·20·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.451445+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$663,540k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.53348·83·+0.1
Hearing disability5.9%9086-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.5%4281+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.6%1258+1.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.967%9094+1.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.2%20·50·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing units6,099———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,12790·58·+0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$41,75496·99·+2.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.9%4689-0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths89.73362+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,16972·54·+0.2
Jail population rate40265·48·-0.1
Labour force6,336———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy78 years3680-0.2County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents9.750·70·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years75.4%6067+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.70814·77·-0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$124,8809697+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$120,91096·98·+2.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$79,15692·92·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work27.9 min1025+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age50.3 years96·94·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$92045·63·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$396,20080·93·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$87,564—91—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$91,0318493+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill4,134100·94·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0772%4656-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.664240-0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.8%3284+0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.98746·25·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.5686·92·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying5.23100·100·+4.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity22%5884-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity34.3%7479-0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,001———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents3.4270·75·-0.1
Owner-occupied housing units3,713———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return12,810———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return228·45·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move10,132———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$47,3588693+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$78,2218891+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,024,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,093———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,048———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)10,899———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over10,249———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over10,896———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,252———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,073———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,031———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,104———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,872———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,988———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,660———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher3,177———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,374———
Poverty rate uncertain8.68%3685+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain8.5%4090-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3802476+0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,767———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,584———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,939———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,973———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,685———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,441———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20248,523———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population85.4%81·82·+1.0
Preventable hospital stays1,7146587-0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate76593·65·+1.5
Private job growth5.9686·90·+0.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,433———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.06029899+4.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents45.552·44·-0.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200077.490·93·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200472.176·82·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20087080·80·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201274.978·83·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.269·70·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207457·62·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202476.461·64·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-1.0420·18·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions8.27%92·92·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.3%58·16·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.5%88·94·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.18%30·28·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.6%44·26·+0.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.8%4090-0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.6%96·88·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.6%72·45·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain5.07%66·62·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race18.4%83·82·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.8%48·59·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%91·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.4%10·8·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.8%72·93·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm66.7%60·69·+0.4CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain4.33%82·77·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic76%20·42·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.16%67·33·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher34.3%8086+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.5%1458+1.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.5660·82·+0.4
Stroke2.6%4890-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.2%46·21·+0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,770———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken12,155———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population12,008———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed213———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%1451+0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18%78·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,098———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%3283-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,088———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,691———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,4512269+0.5County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.