placestats

Big Stone County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5152
Density4.0people per km² of land
Median household income$65,475
Land area1293km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Big Stone County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Adams County, WA, Ochiltree County, TX, Jack County, TX, Mariposa County, CA, Cassia County, ID, Pend Oreille County, WA, Taylor County, IA, Clearwater County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Big Stone Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.598100th pct99th pct +2.4 sd
Friending clustering0.14898th pct by value94th pct by value +2.2 sd
Membership organisations29.298th pct99th pct +2.2 sd
Health score0.676100th pct by value89th pct by value +2.1 sd
Economic connectedness1.1798th pct98th pct +2.1 sd
Social connection score1.6596th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.59810099+2.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.6%7674-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work38,690 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9094-1.7County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.9%7274-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability27.7%9280-1.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.326·5·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.9%9492-1.7CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2459890+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.5%2516+0.6CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain79.666·87·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.2
Business closing rate5.060·4·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments157———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate3.82·3·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%2532+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents19.368·80·+0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.5%7267-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.116%4·3·-1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort880———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income880———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.7%5929+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%9277-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.8%7671-0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61%9479+1.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people48.494·94·+1.4
Coronary heart disease5.5%8068-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%4765-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.6%3743+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.9%8877+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.18·10·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression24.8%2941+0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%9078-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.60790·74·+1.0
Economic connectedness1.179898+2.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8786761+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0770·65·+0.7
Education score-0.2238·29·-0.1
Effective property tax rate0.86134·53·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,303———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents32.884·75·+0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%9279-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.97884-0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.49%9678+1.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.9%7775-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain94———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.3%6974-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%9482-1.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.0219495-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14898·94·+2.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4492646+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$315,790k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.676100·89·+2.1
Hearing disability6.7%8257-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure27.9%9693-1.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.9%7888-0.9CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate79.4%78·79·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.5%7779-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units2,984———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate48016·11·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,58370·78·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.8%7170-0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain87.36765-0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6096·6·-1.3
Jail population rate71.84·2·-1.2
Labour force2,383———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%3763-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.3%7781-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0697124-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.5 years7675+0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.6%8990-1.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2784·96·+1.2
Mammography in the past two years76.8%8878+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.55856·68·+0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$69,6716054+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$57,84370·59·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$48,26048·35·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.4 min6883-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age47.4 years86·87·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$71820·19·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$135,70040·30·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$65,475—57—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$62,2453648-0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,16918·32·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0586%1229-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations29.29899+2.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11%9681-1.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.999100·97·+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.2732·17·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.77734·16·-0.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.7%7664-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity38.2%5950+0.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,179———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.5556·44·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,730———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,580———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return218·32·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,121———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,9237467+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$67,9018482+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$345,960k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,095———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,105———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,202———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,985———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,726———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,366———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line572———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line587———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,991———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,975———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,591———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher795———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,166———
Poverty rate11.5%4666-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.8%5864-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3807876-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,980———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,067———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,990———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,789———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,755———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,974———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,824———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population37.4%22·17·-0.7
Preventable hospital stays430100100-1.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate40838·27·-0.4
Private job growth032·26·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,034———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03377893+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.9%29·27·-0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents80.794·95·+1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200048.94·19·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200449.14·17·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200846.76·21·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201250.76·24·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201663.612·36·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202063.914·38·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202465.114·36·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.172·75·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.43%40·33·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.1%2·15·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22.7%78·84·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.05%80·85·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.4%33·17·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%6967-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.5%88·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.19%16·13·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.82%24·22·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.52%13·20·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.1%60·63·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%96·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.1%18·10·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.7%96·93·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain15.3%—13·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.88%16·11·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.3%92·93·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.02%68·73·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.3%6249+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31%9093-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.6596·99·+2.0
Stroke2.9%7467-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.8%33·26·-0.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,470———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,837———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.8%8983-1.2CDC PLACES
Total population5,152———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed80———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%3451+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate27%80·85·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units805———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.2%8476-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50905———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain72———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,997———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,3047071-0.5County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.