placestats

Yalobusha County, MS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population12,439
Density10.3people per km² of land
Median household income$49,171
Land area1210km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Yalobusha County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Graham County, NC, West Carroll Parish, LA, Winston County, MS, Hardy County, WV, Charlotte County, VA, New Madrid County, MO, St. Helena Parish, LA, Madison County, FL. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Yalobusha Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Dental visit in the past year7.6%4th pct1st pct -3.7 sd
Safety score-2.743rd pct by value2nd pct by value -3.1 sd
Motor vehicle crash deaths48.72nd pct1st pct +2.7 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents83.4100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.6 sd
Religious adherents9598th pct by value99th pct by value +2.5 sd
Health score-1.270th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.34867-1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.9%2922+0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work138,620 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.9%4410+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability40.4%237+0.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.860·66·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28.4%197+0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.408139-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking13.7%9095-1.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents6.4678·91·+0.2
Black-white residential segregation24.129·7·-0.6County Health Rankings
Business closing rate10.682·86·+0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments149———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.9526·26·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.3%7784-1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents014·6·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.4%3212+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.434%90·94·+1.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,328———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,328———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.9%7350+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.2%358+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability20.7%298+0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.3%1412-1.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people44.180·91·+0.8
Coronary heart disease7.1%428+0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%7956-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking21.3%278+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year7.6%41-3.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.6868·74·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression20.7%8884-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes15%156+1.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.468·6·-1.1
Economic connectedness0.6384016-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.039128·9·-0.3
Education score0.065859·47·+0.4
Effective property tax rate0.82377·50·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,926———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents83.4100·100·+2.6
Fair or poor self-rated health27.6%108+0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.34731+0.3County Health Rankings
Firearm fatalities uncertain34.334+2.1County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised11644·57·-0.4CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate17.772·87·+0.5CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.31%1817-1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity29.1%75+1.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.7%8528-1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.8%7116-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.08092236+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13352·82·+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4368662-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$363,430k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.270·2·-2.1
Hearing disability7.8%4217-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure44.1%42+1.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.7%2511+0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.901%3956-0.0County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate70.3%24·31·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity21.5%157+1.3CDC PLACES
Housing units6,476———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,74946·51·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.2%156+0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths14586+1.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,95528·48·-0.4
Labour force5,096———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation14.9%75+1.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support31.6%54+1.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.02128775+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy69.7 years86-1.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness38.2%179+0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents5.1456·39·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years71.4%4231+0.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.95824·10·-0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$52,748229-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$45,83650·20·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,08852·17·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work29.9 min2416+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.4 years50·59·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$81084·42·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$97,20010·8·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$49,171—15—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,7906415+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill80062·17·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0385%129-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations12.96867+0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability19.5%64+1.7CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain48.721+2.7County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99516·56·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.6510·9·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.11652·46·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity37.7%63+1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity40.1%8129-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,037———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents08·11·-1.4
Owner-occupied housing units3,541———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return9,780———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·56·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move8,593———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,9743010-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$44,1884213-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$546,560k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,369———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,386———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)11,817———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over10,222———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,781———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,972———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,666———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,765———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,493———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,163———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,043———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,200———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,106———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census12,481———
Poverty rate22.7%1811+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)20.7%3212+0.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality728168+1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,228———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,971———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,801———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,354———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,077———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,535———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,878———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays6,42741+2.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,20177·89·+0.5
Private job growth-0.80926·18·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,839———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01363223-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps19.1%54·83·-0.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents9598·99·+2.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20004826·17·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200455.234·31·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200853.520·36·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20125214·26·-1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201656.714·23·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202056.910·25·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202460.614·28·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.618·63·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.14%68·49·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit30.6%86·95·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains7.86%14·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.18%22·28·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year79.2%90·92·+1.1CDC PLACES
Safety score-2.743·2·-3.1
Self-care disability5.9%85+1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.4%62·67·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic36.6%82·91·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.3%20·57·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.62%0·6·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90%74·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married31.9%76·70·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46.7%36·20·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm65%44·62·-0.4CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share White, not Hispanic57.7%24·20·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.2%64·89·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher12.3%185-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.4%9441-1.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.75124·11·-0.9
Stroke4.5%64+1.5CDC PLACES
Suicide rate uncertain28.8189+1.1County Health Rankings
Taking blood pressure medication65.7%92·98·+2.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,090———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken17,638———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off14.8%228+0.8CDC PLACES
Total population12,439———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed170———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%8255-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22.2%52·76·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,439———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.1%106+1.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,643———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,630———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost16,34966+1.6County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.