placestats

Wright County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population12,817
Density8.5people per km² of land
Median household income$64,033
Land area1503km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Wright County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: DeWitt County, TX, Jones County, TX, Hancock County, IL, Crawford County, IA, Cherokee County, IA, Taylor County, WI, Sussex County, VA, Montague County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Wright Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations25.2100th pct98th pct +2.6 sd
Share divorced7.47%0th pct by value3rd pct by value -2.4 sd
Median household income (model-based)$74,18998th pct77th pct +2.1 sd
Social connection score0.86594th pct by value91st pct by value +1.6 sd
Friending bias0.1268th pct10th pct +1.6 sd
Preventable hospital stays1,23794th pct96th pct -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4846683+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.6%4448-0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work100,540 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.6%5455-0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability29.3%7768-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.9730·30·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.7%4860-0.1CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.2%107+1.2CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain62.249·65·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents070·45·-0.5
Business closing rate7.9432·36·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments323———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed26———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.194·4·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%5653+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents10.464·58·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.7%6461-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.278%87·70·+1.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,464———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,464———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.3%4023-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.8%4449-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.4%6962-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57%5645+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.784·75·+0.6
Coronary heart disease6%2942+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%8178-0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%4841+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.8%7666+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.2344·36·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression20.9%9083-1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.9%2946+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.27363·58·+0.5
Economic connectedness0.7642040-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8967664+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.2386·72·+1.2
Education score-0.14120·33·-0.6
Effective property tax rate1.5486·89·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,960———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents10.930·25·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%5251-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.25558-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%3630-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity16.1%2947+0.2CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain790———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.5%9071-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.2%6959-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.126810+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11938·59·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4532643+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,043,000k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.23179·68·+0.8
Hearing disability7.1%3339+0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.5%6361-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.1%5465-0.0CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.889%3747-0.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.2%30·49·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%4356-0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units6,266———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate67131·23·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-5,13218·17·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.2%7361-0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain69.79487-1.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,67740·36·-0.5
Jail population rate16113·10·-0.7
Labour force6,132———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.6%4952-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.3%4043+0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.8 years7477+0.8County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0853—34·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$790k———Census local government finances
Loneliness32.7%5467-0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents26.380·95·+1.0
Mammography in the past two years77.3%8282+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.33248·55·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$70,3965556-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,17916·21·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,31156·46·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.2 min8483-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.8 years22·34·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$78842·36·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$109,80016·14·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$64,033—52—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$74,1899877+2.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,69548·56·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.067%2841-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations25.210098+2.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.6%6058-0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99540·56·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.7512·8·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.26630·29·-0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27%4645+0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity41.3%1919+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,352———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.9836·31·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,971———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return11,000———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return260·66·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,786———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,0668667+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,8658680+1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$852,130k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,744———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,656———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over10,170———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,332———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,593———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,834———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,867———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,366———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,657———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,418———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,348———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,020———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census12,943———
Poverty rate14.8%3041+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11%8071-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3648280-1.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,336———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,603———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,395———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,278———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,026———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,254———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,772———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population50%38·31·-0.6
Preventable hospital stays1,2379496-1.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate51041·40·-0.5
Private job growth6.1790·90·+1.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,439———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01783250-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.6%60·55·+0.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents48.646·53·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200054.834·36·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200455.324·32·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200850.828·30·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.122·31·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201666.720·42·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202067.522·46·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202468.522·44·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.844·67·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.37%62·53·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.5%34·38·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.9%56·64·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.31%46·64·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%69·46·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%4648-0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.1%52·72·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced7.47%0·3·-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain6.16%78·70·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race18.7%73·82·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.5%48·56·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%93·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married28%66·49·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.5%76·77·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.09%19·15·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic77%32·44·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.05%62·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23.5%8058+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.4%8081-0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.86594·91·+1.6
Stroke3.1%4650-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%85·64·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,630———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken24,103———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.5%4355+0.0CDC PLACES
Total population12,817———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01182733-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed172———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.8%8276-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate14.6%43·48·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units914———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5%4449-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,492———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain155———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,225———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost6,8799086-1.2County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.