placestats

Shelby County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6011
Density4.6people per km² of land
Median household income$52,127
Land area1297km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Shelby County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Washington County, ME, Wilbarger County, TX, Chaves County, NM, Navajo County, AZ, Clark County, MO, Prairie County, AR, Harrison County, MO, Otero County, NM. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Shelby Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations28.4100th pct99th pct +4.9 sd
Average test score0.075195th pct65th pct +2.1 sd
Social connection score1.3198th pct by value97th pct by value +2.1 sd
Returns reporting capital gains21.4%96th pct by value80th pct by value +1.9 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people49.294th pct by value95th pct by value +1.7 sd
Departures per 100 people staying3.7210th pct by value5th pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4859683+1.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.6%6748-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work52,490 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.9%2213+0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability40.1%108+1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.918·11·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.5%1413+0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.07519565+2.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.4%4353+0.2CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain75.372·85·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents066·45·-0.4
Business closing rate9.9768·78·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments150———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.356·49·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1219+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.8348·36·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.1%8243-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.206%33·38·-0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,059———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,059———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.2%106-1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.4%67+1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.4%25+1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.9%5820-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people49.294·95·+1.7
Coronary heart disease6.9%1812+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma11%4934-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking21.4%128+1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year53.9%5628+0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.7210·5·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Depression27.1%3518+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.5%5336-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.0722·12·-0.7
Economic connectedness0.9119271+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6665723-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.4462·29·+0.3
Education score-0.28939·26·-0.2
Effective property tax rate0.89658·55·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,873———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents3460·77·+0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health23.8%4724+0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.53651+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.34%5624-0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.7%5336-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain107———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.6%2915+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16%2714+0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.005548888-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.14278·90·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4416456-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$244,480k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.41251·27·+0.2
Hearing disability8.8%125+1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.6%3729+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33%4737+0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate75%46·54·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14.5%5034-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units2,952———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate97929·47·-0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,43550·50·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability11.3%1612+0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain90.48060-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,46818·29·-0.7
Jail population rate28015·28·-0.6
Labour force2,953———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.5%4226-0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.7%8788-1.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.7 years8855+1.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.8%7666-0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents9.5984·70·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years69.9%4621-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.0059774·36·+0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,4716226-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$48,31848·28·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,88340·26·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21 min6672-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.6 years50·68·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5708·4·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$86,2002·4·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$52,127—21—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,1217629+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill77230·16·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.119%7489+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations28.410099+4.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.5%3117+0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99880·90·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.66534·22·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.18354·50·+0.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity32.7%3515+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity40.6%2925+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,374———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents012·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,780———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,430———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·61·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,919———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,2704021-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,7757448+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$318,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,930———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,931———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,834———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,506———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,165———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,303———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line902———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line877———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,777———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,732———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,355———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher750———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,103———
Poverty rate15.6%6237-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.3%7636-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4618655-1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,257———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,502———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,316———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,232———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,255———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,350———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,262———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population80%73·75·+0.6
Preventable hospital stays2,3065668-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate69943·60·-0.4
Private job growth1.5458·47·-0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,254———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01784251-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps15.9%47·70·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents48.448·52·+0.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.558·56·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.562·63·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086656·70·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201269.452·69·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.676·81·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20208276·85·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248368·84·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.574·89·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.79%34·17·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.4%26·56·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.4%96·80·+1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.79%52·50·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.8%45·43·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.5%3923-0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.7%50·68·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.4%80·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.78%28·21·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.23%33·15·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.1%54·63·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%92·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.1%18·15·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.9%84·73·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.7%7·8·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.2%86·93·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.64%10·44·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18%5229+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.8%5637-0.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.3198·97·+2.1
Stroke3.6%3321+0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.6%59·55·+0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,800———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,800———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.3%3724-0.0CDC PLACES
Total population6,011———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02351713-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed80———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%9479-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate19.6%44·69·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units578———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6%4327-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,169———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain88———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,495———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,5079268-1.2County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.