placestats

Seminole County, GA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9117
Density14.8people per km² of land
Median household income$49,559
Land area615km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Seminole County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Nicholas County, WV, Bledsoe County, TN, Morgan County, MO, Halifax County, VA, Dodge County, GA, Union County, AR, Bacon County, GA, Jasper County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Seminole Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1734.1%4th pct5th pct +2.1 sd
Share aged 65 and over24.9%94th pct by value86th pct by value +1.8 sd
Effective property tax rate1.2298th pct by value76th pct by value +1.8 sd
Net business formation rate-4.626th pct by value4th pct by value -1.7 sd
Economic connectedness0.4944th pct4th pct -1.7 sd
Median property tax bill1,36194th pct by value42nd pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3548-1.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance14.2%3121+0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work85,095 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.313%3041+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over20.5%7021-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability33.9%9336-1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.9584·81·+1.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.8%8031-0.9CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2672920-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking14.6%8090-0.9CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents5.2582·88·+0.4
Black-white residential segregation41.249·30·-0.1County Health Rankings
Business closing rate11.286·90·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments148———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.68·11·-1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.6%6975-0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents1.0958·14·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain34.1%45+2.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.375%88·90·+1.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,658———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,658———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.1%9872+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%9630-1.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.6%9634-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.1%7246+0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people30.636·73·-0.2
Coronary heart disease6.4%9626-1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.1%4730-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.9%9329-1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year52.7%6024+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.0694·80·+1.4IRS county migration flows
Depression21.2%8980-1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.4%4715+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.48791·28·+1.1
Economic connectedness0.49444-1.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6627123+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.12160·15·+0.1
Education score0.33680·65·+0.7
Effective property tax rate1.2298·76·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,210———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents3956·83·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health23.8%8224-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter91012+1.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%3830-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity23.1%4316+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20%7822-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.1%8725-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03676471-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1594·94·+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.473025+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$416,570k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.46391·24·+1.1
Hearing disability6.7%9357-1.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.7%4413+0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.8%7625-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%7275+0.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.5%44·51·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity19.1%2213+0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units5,061———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.03581315+1.1Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate2,13379·91·+0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,44962·68·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.8%8017-0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths1173423+0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate5,22072·87·+0.2
Jail population rate74355·82·-0.1
Labour force3,338———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation12.1%4115+0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support26.5%3522+0.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy72.7 years8424+0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness39.6%54+1.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents8.1676·62·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years74.7%8861+1.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.91714·11·-1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$53,025189-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,17442·16·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,72514·5·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25 min7645-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.7 years84·81·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$81988·44·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$111,60032·16·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$49,559—16—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$49,4234213-0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,36194·42·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0502%3820-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.18669+0.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.6%8225-0.9CDC PLACES
Mobility score-1.0411·10·-1.4
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain35.3107+1.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99864·84·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-4.626·4·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.89468·74·+0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.7%7323-0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity40%5830-0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,672———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.0116·14·-1.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,736———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,410———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return210·44·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,372———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,1848225+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$47,0888022+0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$427,560k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,080———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,092———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,630———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,325———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,734———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,273———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,700———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,998———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,966———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,960———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,391———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,065———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,147———
Poverty rate19%6221-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)22.3%149+1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6685214+0.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,877———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,274———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,996———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,769———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,588———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,884———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,007———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population71%73·59·+0.8
Preventable hospital stays3,3915625-0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,39591·94·+1.3
Private job growth2.4262·61·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,989———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.00841123-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps20.3%68·86·+0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents53.564·64·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200053.920·33·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.736·48·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200858.222·50·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201260.318·45·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201666.418·41·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202067.616·46·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202470.216·48·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.336·75·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.42%94·69·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit29.2%86·93·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.44%52·16·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.59%2·10·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.4%76·76·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.9%4415-0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.9%94·86·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic33.5%85·90·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.4%28·60·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.93%44·25·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92%78·91·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.1%72·62·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married47.9%26·25·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic61.9%22·25·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain9.55%78·92·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher15.8%6619+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41%3618+0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.66438·14·-0.4
Stroke3.9%3612+0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication63.4%89·93·+1.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,390———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,259———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off12.8%4615+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population9,117———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01536976+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed128———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.8%3836+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate27.4%88·86·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,389———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.5%4719-0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,924———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,404———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost13,3776618-0.2County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.