placestats

San Augustine County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7889
Density5.7people per km² of land
Median household income$46,338
Land area1374km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like San Augustine County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Winn Parish, LA, St. Clair County, MO, Franklin County, MS, Terry County, TX, Talbot County, GA, Warren County, GA, Hughes County, OK, Okfuskee County, OK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where San Augustine Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$59,023100th pct65th pct +2.5 sd
Mean income of departing households$56,74896th pct by value63rd pct by value +2.4 sd
Private job growth13.498th pct by value98th pct by value +2.0 sd
Frequent mental distress22.7%4th pct3rd pct +1.8 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance19%4th pct6th pct +1.8 sd
Self-care disability6.5%2nd pct3rd pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3843225-0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance19%46+1.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work70,865 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.444%1412+0.5County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over26%166+0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability41%336+0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.856·66·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.6%6323-0.4CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.458267-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.1%4672+0.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents7.878·93·+0.6
Black-white residential segregation56.788·65·+1.4County Health Rankings
Business closing rate8.348·44·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments122———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.874·72·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.4%6581-0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.5378·25·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain31.8%247+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.338%52·85·-0.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,716———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,716———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.8%239-0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease10.4%62+1.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.7%254+0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.7%1610-0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people4872·94·+0.6
Coronary heart disease7.7%63+1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.8%139+0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking22.9%194+1.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year44.4%125-0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.3654·68·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression26.7%4422+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes15.2%175+0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.828·3·-1.2
Economic connectedness0.6413517-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.37196·25·+1.6
Education score-1.1813·4·-1.4
Effective property tax rate0.81675·49·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,153———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents36.640·80·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health30.6%23+1.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.34131+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%8853+1.1County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population uncertain383———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress22.7%43+1.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17.7%23+1.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0434867-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12834·76·-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4981610+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,018,200k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.91340·7·-0.4
Hearing disability8.1%4611-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure40%489+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.3%6932-0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.8%42·53·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing units4,799———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,29353·66·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$53340·41·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability13.7%22+1.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1046840-0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,33844·58·-0.3
Jail population rate42838·52·-0.4
Labour force3,327———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy70.6 years289-0.4County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents2.3914·14·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years67.9%2211-0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.1626·7·-0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,0919227+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$57,28192·57·+1.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$56,74896·63·+2.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.6 min3822+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.8 years84·91·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$74171·25·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$83,5006·3·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$46,338—11—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,9088416+0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill68159·12·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0666%6441-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.641223-1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability20%63+1.4CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain45.682+1.5County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99642·70·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.4970·76·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.44260·61·+0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity36%216+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity43.9%196+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,017———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.8
Owner-occupied housing units2,256———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,400———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return242·72·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,427———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$25,9024212-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$59,02310065+2.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$465,220k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,882———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,833———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,595———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,232———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,782———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,136———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,101———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,546———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,649———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,616———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,874———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher666———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,918———
Poverty rate27.5%86+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)20.3%4413-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality742226+0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,805———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,757———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,715———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,690———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,569———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,002———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,747———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population75.9%60·67·+0.6
Preventable hospital stays3,5773620+0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate86454·73·-0.0
Private job growth13.498·98·+2.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,679———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01756048-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents49.440·54·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.450·42·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200459.746·45·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.852·65·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201267.458·64·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201674.250·61·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202075.452·66·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.252·70·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202421.866·88·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.47%58·34·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit25%32·86·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12%72·32·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.09%82·76·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.1%8·30·-1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability6.5%23+1.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.1%92·92·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain0.748%—69·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic22.1%45·82·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15.4%82·92·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain4.85%86·60·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.15%90·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.1%30·38·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20.8%12·6·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57.2%92·80·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain3.88%81·97·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic68.5%54·33·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.6%6·43·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher11.5%164-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41.8%3412+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.57636·17·-0.4
Stroke4.6%43+1.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication61.4%54·85·+0.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,240———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,166———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population7,889———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01852819-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed174———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.2%129+1.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate37.1%92·95·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,782———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.7%64+1.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,469———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,480———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost15,177299+0.3County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.