placestats

Pulaski County, GA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9893
Density15.3people per km² of land
Median household income$47,688
Land area646km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pulaski County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Brantley County, GA, Winston County, AL, Wyoming County, WV, Holmes County, FL, Morgan County, KY, Copiah County, MS, McDonald County, MO, Leake County, MS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pulaski Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Incarceration of children raised poor here0.08050th pct0th pct +6.9 sd
Mobility score-3.030th pct by value0th pct by value -5.5 sd
Share widowed15.1%100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.7 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.33%100th pct by value85th pct by value +3.0 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying2.98100th pct by value97th pct by value +2.9 sd
Life expectancy75.2 years98th pct49th pct +2.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.34446-1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance15.7%1414+0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work80,355 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over19.3%8027-0.9CDC PLACES
Any disability35.8%8126-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying9.898·92·+2.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.3%8126-0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2993317-0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking14.2%7793-1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents5.678·89·+0.3
Black-white residential segregation46.764·42·+0.1County Health Rankings
Business closing rate13.296·97·+1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments166———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.694·89·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.5%6578-0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents016·6·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain31.9%147+0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.5%96·98·+2.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,400———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,400———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.8%8167+0.9CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.5%7016-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19%6320-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.3%5230+0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.312·53·-1.2
Coronary heart disease6.5%7922-1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.8%309+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.4%7217-0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year51.1%5818+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.8284·77·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression23.1%7258-0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.8%3712+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.956·16·+0.4
Economic connectedness0.6033812-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6989028+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.091824·8·-0.6
Education score-0.058256·38·+0.0
Effective property tax rate0.91282·56·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,702———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents36.362·80·+0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health25.9%4414-0.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter91012+1.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%4430-0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity25.8%3211+0.6CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain351———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress21.4%427+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress16.4%4910+0.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03567072-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12426·69·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.465635-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$349,400k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.48591·23·+1.2
Hearing disability6.9%8448-1.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.2%6316-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.9%6123-0.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%4240-0.2County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate67.6%12·22·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity21%248+1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units4,240———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.080500+6.9Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,32851·68·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,56214·31·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.1%267+0.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain69.410087-2.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,13063·80·+0.2
Jail population rate56946·67·-0.3
Labour force3,831———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation13.3%2710+0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support26.9%3519+0.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy75.2 years9849+2.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness40.4%02+2.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.6360·52·+0.2
Mammography in the past two years73.4%7049+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.97524·10·-0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,7596418+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,95136·15·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,51372·25·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24.8 min8246-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.7 years64·69·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$78974·36·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$144,30078·34·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$47,688—13—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$46,123167-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,31696·39·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0371%249-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.014434-0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17%5814-0.3CDC PLACES
Mobility score-3.030·0·-5.5
Mutual-friend share0.99414·50·-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.632·23·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.98100·97·+2.9IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity32.5%5415-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity41.1%4921-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,284———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents2.0970·57·+0.5
Owner-occupied housing units2,220———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,080———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return220·37·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,072———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$24,8492410-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,077388-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$425,570k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,114———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,095———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over8,460———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,287———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,616———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,292———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,577———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,017———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,610———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,770———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,452———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher914———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,855———
Poverty rate uncertain18.3%7623-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)23%127+0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5369637-1.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,346———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,511———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,953———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,682———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,605———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,059———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,336———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population86.8%82·83·+1.1
Preventable hospital stays3,6693818+0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate75949·65·-0.3
Private job growth5.4488·88·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,288———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01132411-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps23.5%82·92·+1.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents50.652·57·+0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20005862·47·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20046370·56·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086568·68·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201266.756·62·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201668.834·46·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202069.736·51·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202470.334·48·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.330·62·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.33%100·85·+3.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit27.2%76·91·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains11.1%84·26·+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.792%8·14·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.9%67·82·+0.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.4%269+0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.2%80·78·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic33%60·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.3%48·72·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain3.55%89·49·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain6.48%89·55·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.4%6·22·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married32.3%78·72·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married39.3%2·6·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic57.4%28·20·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain15.1%100·100·+4.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher12%205-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours41.9%3212+0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.90520·7·-1.0
Stroke4.1%289+0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication63.1%77·92·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,790———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,652———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off13.9%3511+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population9,893———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0115066+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed129———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%7051-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22.5%82·77·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units956———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.2%2813+0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,785———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,245———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,2699847-2.0County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.