placestats

Pleasants County, WV

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7572
Density22.5people per km² of land
Median household income$61,038
Land area337km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pleasants County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Lamar County, TX, Henry County, KY, Dorchester County, MD, Washington County, IN, Chester County, TN, Clarion County, PA, Randolph County, IN, Perquimans County, NC. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pleasants Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Gini index of income inequality0.5610th pct1st pct +5.6 sd
Per capita income$40,318100th pct80th pct +3.7 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.030th pct by value3rd pct by value -3.6 sd
Poverty rate8%100th pct89th pct -3.4 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.6%0th pct3rd pct +3.1 sd
Arthritis31.5%2nd pct2nd pct +3.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.48210082+3.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.9%7570-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work80,360 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.6%03+3.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.6%4235+0.0CDC PLACES
Any disability36.1%1825+1.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.592·7·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis31.5%22+3.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.307216-1.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17%6860-0.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents040·45·-0.6
Business closing rate7.5634·29·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments120———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.2444·47·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2311+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.1846·28·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.9%8255-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.34%94·85·+2.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort839———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income839———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84%8070+0.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.4%1618+0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.1%1419+1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening63%10090+1.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people36.698·83·+2.0
Coronary heart disease6.5%1122+1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.8%119+0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.9%1414+1.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year53.3%1626-1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.6266·48·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression31.8%02+1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.2%2127+0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.25136·35·-0.4
Economic connectedness0.8199053+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.5841214-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.86698·53·+1.7
Education score0.82192·89·+1.4
Effective property tax rate0.58226·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,100———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents13.322·33·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health23.1%1628+1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.36156-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.44%5260+0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.4%8253-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22.4%23+2.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.5%519+1.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04138068-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13898·87·+1.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.56101+5.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$715,740k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.5275·21·-1.4
Hearing disability7.2%2534+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure38.2%716+1.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol36.4%22+1.8CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%10099+1.5County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate82.3%90·91·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.7%5952-0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units3,218———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate4750·11·-1.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,57432·46·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.7%3031+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain85.18668-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6392·7·-1.2
Jail population rate33918·38·-1.0
Labour force3,241———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.8%5348-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.5%3841+0.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.8 years6645+0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness35.1%2434+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.178·71·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years78.7%9891+1.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.18912·29·-1.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,6926239+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$50,94040·37·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$49,36662·39·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.7 min3222+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years68·67·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$7004·16·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$129,30018·27·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,038—43—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,9916245+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill7528·15·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0922%6074+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.26669+0.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.5%3435+0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99658·64·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.6866·66·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.030·3·-3.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity31.2%721+1.6CDC PLACES
Obesity43.5%28+2.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,779———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents02·11·-1.2
Owner-occupied housing units2,288———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,080———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return212·21·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,461———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$40,31810080+3.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$54,1818250+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$402,020k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,420———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,428———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,455———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,004———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,486———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,403———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain565———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line969———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,060———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,683———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,755———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher803———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,653———
Poverty rate uncertain8%10089-3.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.5%5242-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4907248-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,208———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,435———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,975———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,840———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,150———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,491———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,348———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population64.8%50·51·+0.0
Preventable hospital stays4,85304+2.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1980·5·-1.6
Private job growth2.8572·66·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,948———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01481830-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps16.1%71·70·+0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents26.612·7·-1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200059.848·53·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.442·47·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200860.858·57·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201265.660·59·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201679.282·77·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202079.784·78·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248078·75·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202420.382·86·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.49%10·12·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.4%6·38·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains7.76%2·8·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.78%92·90·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.1%77·72·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%6448-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.5%24·39·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%0·14·-2.6Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced16.4%96·96·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain3.09%46·27·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.2%64·64·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%96·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married28.5%78·53·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married50.1%12·36·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.7%92·95·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed4.99%0·13·-2.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher14.6%1213-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours43.4%26+2.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.026152·48·+0.0
Stroke3.2%5542-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60%82·76·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,350———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,367———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.9%1527+1.2CDC PLACES
Total population7,572———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.0339595+1.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed141———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.4%2020+0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.6%50·44·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain439———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%8658-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,422———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,800———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,0339473-1.9County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.