placestats

Piatt County, IL

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population16,702
Density14.7people per km² of land
Median household income$87,516
Land area1138km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Piatt County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Gilpin County, CO, Mills County, IA, Camden County, NC, Benton County, IA, Gallatin County, MT, La Plata County, CO, Pottawatomie County, KS, Cass County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Piatt Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over5.3%100th pct99th pct -2.1 sd
Effective property tax rate1.7698th pct by value94th pct by value +1.8 sd
Cholesterol screening85.7%90th pct89th pct +1.4 sd
Hearing disability5.7%94th pct90th pct -1.3 sd
Homeownership rate85.4%96th pct by value97th pct by value +1.2 sd
Unemployment rate3.7%10th pct39th pct +1.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4484469-0.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance6.6%8496-1.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work184,520 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.5%156+1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over5.3%10099-2.1CDC PLACES
Any disability25.3%5893-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.7328·47·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.4%5279-0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1013769-0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%329+0.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents068·45·-0.3
Black-white residential segregation47.938·44·-0.2County Health Rankings
Business closing rate6.7710·16·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments299———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened27———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.1430·45·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2211+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents6.9128·45·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain8%7695-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.143%31·10·-0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,191———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,191———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.7%9089+1.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.5%2882+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.7%8293-0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59.3%3065-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people21.680·50·+0.9
Coronary heart disease4.9%7491-0.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.1%4873-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.7%6886-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year67.5%6291+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.4932·44·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression23.1%4658+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.4%6893-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.1680·95·+0.8
Economic connectedness1.024286+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.077186+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.7266·89·+0.1
Education score0.59563·79·+0.4
Effective property tax rate1.7698·94·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed8,611———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents13.752·35·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health14.8%6093-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.51124+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%5471+0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.5%5394-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain148———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.3%2674+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.2%5692-0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03285874-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11880·57·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4146084-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$683,320k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.51442·83·-0.2
Hearing disability5.7%9490-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.2%4684-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.2%2863+0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.927%6576+0.5County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate85.4%96·97·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.5%5092-0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units7,380———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate40332·7·-0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,47244·68·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.8%5091-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths70.27487-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,85657·44·-0.2
Jail population rate20232·16·-0.4
Labour force8,943———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.1%7096-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.1%3557+0.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy78.4 years4283-0.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.2%3861+0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents15.974·86·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years72.6%2041-0.9CDC PLACES
Material security score1.2180·97·+0.7
Mean adjusted gross income per return$91,8855488-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$68,24546·78·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$61,77338·74·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.7 min6854-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.5 years60·60·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$95036·67·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$173,2002·50·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$87,516—91—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$81,6115087-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill3,04070·87·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.111%8886+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.98680+0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.9%5893-0.5CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain14.75066-0.3County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.98760·26·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.3766·75·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.23548·52·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity19.2%7694-0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity34.9%5276+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,851———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents086·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents04·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units5,851———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return15,480———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return254·52·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move14,026———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$43,5477088+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$70,4937185+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,178,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population16,720———BEA Regional Accounts
Population16,714———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over13,697———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over13,082———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over11,909———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,421———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain987———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,120———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined16,605———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined16,471———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago14,917———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher3,797———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census16,673———
Poverty rate uncertain5.94%9297-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)6.8%8897-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3086491-0.5County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20008,385———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20048,586———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20088,999———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20128,707———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20169,008———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20209,822———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20249,508———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population61.9%49·47·-0.0
Preventable hospital stays3,1691432+0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate20229·6·-0.6
Private job growth3.4362·73·+0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,715———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0225072-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps uncertain9.6%73·25·+0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents36.638·24·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20005738·43·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200463.354·57·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200856.444·45·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201263.764·54·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201668.154·45·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202065.244·41·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202465.640·37·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20248.666·47·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.58%10·57·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit8.64%34·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.5%52·80·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.72%74·70·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.7%80·55·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.6%7095-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.5%76·58·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.5%57·28·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.4%48·28·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain0.886%2·4·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.56%6·5·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.3%62·66·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%89·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.3%18·16·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.7%72·93·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.1%96·96·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed5.64%54·22·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher31.9%5681-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.8%3671+0.5CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.63164·85·+0.6
Stroke2.5%6494-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication55.7%30·18·-0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed8,100———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken37,010———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6%5593-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population16,702———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.00645257+0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed332———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.7%1039+1.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain7.17%25·13·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain529———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.4%8096-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 503,427———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute7,794———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost6,4936289-0.4County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.