placestats

Moore County, TN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6611
Density19.8people per km² of land
Median household income$66,687
Land area335km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Moore County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Pendleton County, KY, Edgefield County, SC, Hancock County, KY, Otsego County, MI, White County, IN, Green Lake County, WI, Susquehanna County, PA, Caledonia County, VT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Moore Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership of volunteering groups0.2%100th pct99th pct +4.8 sd
Firearm suicide rate27.9100th pct by value98th pct by value +4.1 sd
Friending bias-0.058100th pct99th pct -3.4 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 202434.1100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.7 sd
Arthritis28%0th pct10th pct +2.6 sd
Depression30.6%0th pct4th pct +2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.457070+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.7%2837+0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work65,780 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.6%8683-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability35.3%229+1.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.482·75·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28%010+2.6CDC PLACES
Binge drinking16.4%8668-1.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents2.3292·77·+0.9
Black-white residential segregation45.727·39·-0.4County Health Rankings
Business closing rate5.414·6·-1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments75———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.1128·29·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2319+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents04·6·-1.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.8%8677-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort595———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income595———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.1%9172+0.8CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.1%522+1.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.8%021+2.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.1%1221-1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.982·67·+1.2
Coronary heart disease6.2%534+1.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%5439+0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.1%519+1.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.6%3043-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.3288·84·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression30.6%04+2.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.3%2139+0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.24714·35·-1.3
Economic connectedness0.8425258-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8495256+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score178·61·+0.5
Education score0.7196·85·+1.4
Effective property tax rate0.4836·13·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,821———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents22.664·58·+0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health21.7%1937+1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.96465-0.5County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised15093·96·+2.0CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate27.9100·98·+4.1CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%7671+0.5County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress21%010+2.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.8%530+1.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.05810099-3.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13190·80·+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4345464-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$621,090k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.10247·59·-0.0
Hearing disability7.3%1231+0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.7%928+1.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.3%516+1.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%7975+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate82.3%98·91·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing units2,996———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,24076·64·+0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,40646·50·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.6%733+1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1013644+0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,34357·58·-0.3
Jail population rate75989·83·+0.4
Labour force2,915———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy77.7 years9077+1.0County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents7.5544·58·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years72.1%3037-0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.69590·76·+1.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$77,7118671+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,55756·55·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$54,15262·56·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24 min4852-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.2 years88·83·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$7464·26·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$259,30086·78·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$66,687—59—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$66,4356060+0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,25220·37·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.2%10099+4.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations5.93813-1.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.5%1935+1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99358·46·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.778·79·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.075144·44·-0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.5%4449+0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity38.4%4748+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,638———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents080·78·-0.4
Other religion adherents0.0320·18·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units2,171———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,010———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return274·68·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,327———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,1937868+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$51,9363642-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$351,820k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,774———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,748———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)6,133———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over5,588———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,434———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,768———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,416———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain732———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line662———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,502———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,687———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,120———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,176———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,461———
Poverty rate uncertain11.3%7067-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.9%10080-1.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4076669-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,301———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,773———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,952———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,799———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,926———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,539———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,654———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population29%14·11·-1.2
Preventable hospital stays2,0067679-0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate83284·71·+0.5
Private job growth-3.584·6·-1.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,591———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01875456-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents32.520·16·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200050.814·24·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200460.650·48·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200869.586·79·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201274.488·82·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.498·86·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202083.498·88·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248598·89·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202434.1100·98·+2.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.93%60·44·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.7%16·25·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains15%46·48·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.977%4·21·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%49·46·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%2648+0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.4%68·67·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain2.95%68·43·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain11.1%30·38·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.6%100·93·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.6%0·13·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married58.1%98·84·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm84.6%95·97·+2.1CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.44%17·23·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.1%72·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.18%88·76·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher24.7%7063+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.8%3437+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.0080530·49·-0.3
Stroke3.2%1642+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.5%44·36·+0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,070———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,947———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population6,611———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0159775+1.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed94———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%6259-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain11.9%38·36·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain358———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5%2849+0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,402———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,740———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,2988282-1.0County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.