placestats

Meade County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3949
Density1.6people per km² of land
Median household income$74,868
Land area2533km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Meade County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Aurora County, SD, Kearny County, KS, Sweetwater County, WY, Jerauld County, SD, Spink County, SD, Miner County, SD, Oneida County, ID, Cameron Parish, LA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Meade Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Injury deaths1640th pct3rd pct +2.9 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents4996th pct by value92nd pct by value +2.4 sd
Religious adherents8896th pct by value97th pct by value +1.6 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.5066th pct7th pct +1.6 sd
Membership organisations30.890th pct99th pct +1.6 sd
Share in the same house a year ago81.1%6th pct by value5th pct by value -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5466695+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.4%2025+0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work28,215 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10%7886-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability31.6%2052+0.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.0578·70·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.2%3268+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.06193262-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.3%8054-0.9CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain130—99·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate9.0152·61·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments112———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.872·72·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%8269-0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents18.476·78·+0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.3%4474+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.26%93·63·+1.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort723———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income723———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.2%4022-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.6%1254+1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.5%1847+1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.3%5247+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people49.388·95·+1.2
Coronary heart disease5.9%1047+1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.1%4473-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.2%1648+0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59%2650-0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.8866·56·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression21.2%7280-0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.3%1657+0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.1322·51·-0.8
Economic connectedness0.9483677-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.5870·84·+0.4
Education score-0.48416·18·-1.1
Effective property tax rate1.5296·89·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,861———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents4996·92·+2.4
Fair or poor self-rated health19.8%1851+0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.61772+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%5627+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.7%2150+1.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population386———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.5%2671+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%2861+0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02518297-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1132·40·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.50667+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$278,610k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.11812·44·-0.9
Hearing disability7.2%2634+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.6%1060+1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.6%1858+1.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate72.7%18·42·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.8%1440+1.3CDC PLACES
Housing units1,869———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-17,5438·2·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.4%1857+0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain16403+2.9County Health Rankings
Labour force1,908———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.3%2457+0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23%2458+0.3CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.0376—23—Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy74.1 years838-1.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00883—16·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$23k———Census local government finances
Loneliness32.8%1466+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents20.662·92·+0.3
Mammography in the past two years69.5%2419-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.3069·53·-1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$82,5525878+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$36,5090·3·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$54,05238·55·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16.5 min7492-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age37.5 years22·18·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$79943·39·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$122,00012·22·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,868—78—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$71,5725272+0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,85878·62·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0859%5867-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations30.89099+1.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.2%1450+1.0CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain62.8—0—County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99666·67·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.866·68·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.1790·80·+1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.2%1032+1.4CDC PLACES
Obesity37%3060+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,496———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents034·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units1,087———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,700———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return266·71·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,332———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$44,3598489+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$74,7456089-0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$292,330k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,911———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,911———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,077———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,875———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,545———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over660———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain255———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain368———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,852———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,833———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,203———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher579———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,055———
Poverty rate uncertain6.62%8896-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain9.6%7683-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5071144+1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,053———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,121———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,931———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,709———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,720———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,825———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,695———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays3,0512737+0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate53755·43·+0.1
Private job growth-1.2922·14·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs994———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04259297+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.7%62·17·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents8896·97·+1.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20008079·96·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200483.183·97·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200881.279·96·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201284.783·96·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201687.179·95·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202085.375·92·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202485.273·90·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.2127·35·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.19%60·50·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.7%60·25·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.5%66·89·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%40·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.2%84·31·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%1653+0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over16.7%20·23·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%59·14·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12%69·51·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born9.77%80·84·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race23.2%78·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago81.1%6·5·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24%48·20·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.2%32·75·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.46%11·24·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic72.9%22·38·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain7.9%72·71·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.8%4255-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.9%2463+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.6488·99·+1.3
Stroke3%1858+0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.6%86·55·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,880———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,603———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.5%1041+1.4CDC PLACES
Total population3,949———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.0252311-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed47———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%6486-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate20%50·70·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units373———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.9%2252+0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50763———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain99———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,709———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain10,4322545+0.6County Health Rankings

16of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.