placestats

McLean County, KY

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9127
Density14.0people per km² of land
Median household income$70,549
Land area654km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like McLean County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Charles City County, VA, Livingston County, IL, Grant County, WA, Oglethorpe County, GA, Howard County, TX, Lewis County, WA, Hancock County, ME, Oneida County, WI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where McLean Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Economic connectedness in high school0.480th pct6th pct -4.5 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents55.9100th pct by value96th pct by value +3.3 sd
Median household income (model-based)$58,4034th pct37th pct -2.6 sd
Median gross rent$6020th pct by value5th pct by value -2.5 sd
Congregations per 10,000 people33.9100th pct by value79th pct by value +2.5 sd
Children in single-parent households0.0725%0th pct by value0th pct by value -2.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4262455-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Aggregate travel time to work100,800 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.7%413+2.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.0862·54·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Average test score0.1117771+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Black Protestant adherents1.3886·69·+0.8
Business closing rate9.1254·63·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments154———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.7762·57·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Catholic adherents3.4614·30·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.4%2652+0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.0725%0·0·-2.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,154———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,154———Social Capital Atlas
Colorectal cancer screening64%9494+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people33.9100·79·+2.5
Dental visit in the past year58.4%2847-0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.1774·63·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Economic connectedness0.895268+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.4806-4.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.6216·39·-1.5
Education score0.41670·70·+0.7
Effective property tax rate0.67614·35·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,704———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents55.9100·96·+3.3
Fine particulate matter8.43628+0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%6271+0.4County Health Rankings
Friending bias0.05976054-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12784·74·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4383060+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$308,680k———BEA Regional Accounts
High school graduation0.925%7275+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate81.2%82·87·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing units4,171———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$37328·40·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Injury deaths uncertain80.96873-0.5County Health Rankings
Labour force3,887———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy74.5 years1442-1.0County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.914—88·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$4,380k———Census local government finances
Mainline Protestant adherents15.974·86·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years73.3%4448-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.41428·60·-0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$63,988636-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,2340·22·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,8618·26·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.6 min2422+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.2 years68·66·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6020·5·-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$145,60018·35·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$70,549—69—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$58,403437-2.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill9842·25·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0551%1625-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations19.810093+2.0County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99356·46·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.65160·45·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.087126·36·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Occupied housing units3,608———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents1.4936·43·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,929———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,730———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return284·82·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,892———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,2062253-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$50,3011235-0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$456,530k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,076———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,054———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,452———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,955———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,351———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,805———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line840———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,320———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,046———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,980———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,334———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,170———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,152———
Poverty rate9.29%8282-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.7%1040+1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5151242+1.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,022———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,435———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,422———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,200———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,566———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,782———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,634———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays4,280128+1.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate79277·68·+0.8
Private job growth0.89642·36·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,238———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01835053-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents78.196·94·+2.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20005648·40·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200458.648·41·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200854.948·40·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201265.470·59·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201677.486·71·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.288·71·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202478.388·70·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.494·89·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.08%12·25·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.9%78·59·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.5%30·34·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.6%38·69·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Share aged 65 and over19.8%44·50·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.37%10·15·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.04%27·12·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.3%88·86·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%96·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.4%0·8·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married62%96·95·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.09%19·15·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.7%90·95·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.21%76·56·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.4%2832-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.9%419+1.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.46766·78·+0.7
Tax returns filed3,840———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,876———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population9,127———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.008556340+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed183———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.7%1015+1.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.5%66·44·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain563———Census ACS 5-year
Women aged 15 to 501,805———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,526———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost8,6004867+0.0County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.