placestats

Los Alamos County, NM

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population19,374
Density68.5people per km² of land
Median household income$143,190
Land area283km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Los Alamos County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Hunterdon County, NJ, Fauquier County, VA, Douglas County, CO, Marin County, CA, Calvert County, MD, Williamson County, TN, Carver County, MN, Putnam County, NY. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Los Alamos Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 5098.4100th pct by value95th pct by value +4.6 sd
Private job growth13100th pct by value98th pct by value +4.5 sd
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0.743%100th pct by value69th pct by value +3.3 sd
Mean travel time to work14.4 min100th pct97th pct -3.2 sd
Membership organisations16.2100th pct85th pct +3.0 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.129%100th pct92nd pct +3.0 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4727879+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance5.9%9299-0.9CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work127,270 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over4.4%96100-1.7CDC PLACES
Any disability20.1%92100-1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying8.474·85·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis18.9%8199-1.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.5438099+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.3%4438+0.1CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain98.4100·95·+4.6Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents038·45·-0.7
Black-white residential segregation4959·47·+0.3County Health Rankings
Business closing rate8.1616·41·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments341———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed28———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate70·15·-2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%6560-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents21.468·84·+0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain3.4%98100-1.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.129%33·6·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort573———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income573———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening86.5%4294-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3.2%100100-2.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability9.7%96100-1.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60%2071-1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people1698·33·+2.6
Coronary heart disease4%92100-1.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma8.9%9298-1.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking7.1%98100-2.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year78%100100+2.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying9.1696·95·+2.5IRS county migration flows
Depression21.3%7379-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes6.7%98100-1.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.95100·100·+1.7
Economic connectedness1.127695+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.417099+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score3.2680·99·+1.0
Effective property tax rate0.57313·23·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed12,948———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents10.648·24·-0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health11%98100-1.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.910096-1.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.56%7895+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity6.9%100100-1.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population2,150———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress13%98100-2.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress9%98100-1.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0227680-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.096952·16·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3739899-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$3,520,800k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score1.55100·100·+2.0
Hearing disability5%7398-0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure24.3%9699-1.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.2%9694-2.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.5%20·51·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity6.9%98100-1.5CDC PLACES
Housing units8,660———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1610·0·-1.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-19,1044·2·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability4.6%100100-1.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths71.53685+0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate77533·9·-0.7
Jail population rate12015·5·-0.9
Labour force13,157———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation4.7%100100-1.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.2%7393-0.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy83 years9899+1.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.9%7677-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents12.994·81·+1.4
Mammography in the past two years74.5%1059-1.4CDC PLACES
Material security score1.82100·100·+2.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$138,5907098+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$89,48936·92·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$108,59082·99·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work14.4 min10097-3.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.1 years62·46·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,30810·89·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$452,50056·95·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$143,190—100—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$146,210100100+2.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,59112·80·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.129%10092+3.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.210085+3.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability7%100100-1.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.97478·9·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.172·17·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.7614·16·-1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity12.7%100100-2.7CDC PLACES
Obesity25.1%9298-1.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units8,211———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0.4190·95·+1.0
Other religion adherents9.5394·95·+2.2
Owner-occupied housing units6,121———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return18,690———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return232·38·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move16,428———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$72,68496100+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$92,7656596+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,801,500k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population19,420———BEA Regional Accounts
Population19,444———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over15,993———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over15,411———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over14,090———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,519———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain740———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined19,266———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined19,474———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago16,512———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher9,616———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census19,419———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain3.8%98100-1.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality178100100-1.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 200010,218———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 200411,197———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 200811,069———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 201210,654———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 201610,885———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 202012,293———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 202412,187———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population33.3%0·14·-1.6
Preventable hospital stays1,06710097-1.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate40.10·0·-1.4
Private job growth13100·98·+4.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs19,788———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03149691+2.2Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps4.6%7·0·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents54.992·67·+1.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200057.532·46·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200452.724·25·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200846.520·20·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20124818·20·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201637.712·7·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202036.212·6·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202434.412·4·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-23.20·0·-2.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions9.51%14·95·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit3.7%0·1·-2.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains31%82·97·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.701%6·11·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year69.2%0·8·-2.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability1.9%98100-1.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.2%68·35·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain0.743%100·69·+3.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic4.98%61·92·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.2%4·24·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.8%92·33·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born11.1%70·88·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race17.9%84·81·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.2%10·21·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%59·83·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.2%18·29·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.4%76·92·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.5%69·80·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic70.3%38·35·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.6%6·2·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher68.2%100100+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours27.9%9499-1.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.2100·97·+2.7
Stroke2%98100-1.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.8%15·9·-1.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed9,990———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken28,271———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off4.8%8899-1.0CDC PLACES
Total population19,374———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed209———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.6%10099-1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain5.18%55·5·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain449———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability2.7%96100-1.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 504,138———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain407———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute8,836———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost3,583100100-1.8County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.